2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI liver fat quantification in an oncologic population: the added value of complex chemical shift-encoded MRI

Abstract: The novel CSE-MRI method described here provides increased reproducibility and confidence in diagnosing hepatic steatosis in a oncologic clinical setting. IDEAL-IQ has been proved to be more reproducible than conventional IOP imaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although MRI imaging techniques are considered to be more precise for quantifying hepatic steatosis, our study suggests that DECT based fat quantification may be another useful tool, perhaps comparable to the recently developed CSE-MRI method. [22][23][24] DECT is also more effective in allowing correction of beam irradiation, and for this reason the MMD technique may be less influenced by body size compared to single-energy CT. 19,[25][26][27] Some patients with increased fat content progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. DECT allows the discrimination of substance using monochromatic image (MI), and steatosis exhibit specifically the CT value of each energy level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although MRI imaging techniques are considered to be more precise for quantifying hepatic steatosis, our study suggests that DECT based fat quantification may be another useful tool, perhaps comparable to the recently developed CSE-MRI method. [22][23][24] DECT is also more effective in allowing correction of beam irradiation, and for this reason the MMD technique may be less influenced by body size compared to single-energy CT. 19,[25][26][27] Some patients with increased fat content progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. DECT allows the discrimination of substance using monochromatic image (MI), and steatosis exhibit specifically the CT value of each energy level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MRI imaging techniques are considered to be more precise for quantifying hepatic steatosis, our study suggests that DECT based fat quantification may be another useful tool, perhaps comparable to the recently developed CSE-MRI method. 22 -24 DECT is also more effective in allowing correction of beam irradiation, and for this reason the MMD technique may be less influenced by body size compared to single-energy CT. 19,25 -27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians increasingly demand the quantification of liver fat to grade the level of hepatic damage, not only in living donors for liver transplantation and for patients who must undergo liver resections or bariatric surgery but also in patients receiving potentially hepatotoxic therapies. The ability of MR-based methods to detect and quantify steatosis has been investigated in the past 30 years, and substantial correlations between pathologically and radiologically determined fat fractions have been demonstrated[ 77 - 79 ].…”
Section: Yellow Livermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation (IDEAL-IQ), a chemical shift-encoded (CSE) sequence, is considered the state-of-the-art technique in fat quantification ( 15 , 16 ). Compared with other sequences such as T1-in-and-out-of-phase (IOP) MRI, CSE-MRI is a more sophisticated fat quantification approach which corrects for a number of confounding factors including T1 bias, noise bias and eddy currents ( 17 19 ). An iterative least-squares decomposition algorithm is used to solve for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps enabling the quantitative assessment of fatty lesions, which have been widely applied in the imaging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease ( 20 , 21 ) as well as bone marrow fat in hematological diseases ( 22 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%