2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4538-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI is not reliable in diagnosing of concomitant anterolateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee

Abstract: Case-control study, Level III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because the ALL is a thin structure (thickness 1.4+/-0.6mm) 18 , it should be expected that clinical studies using more typical slice thicknesses (particularly if an interslice gap is present) have failed to show full visualisation reliably. In previous clinical MRI series the following slice thicknesses and rates of complete visualisation have been reported: 2.5mm (Helito 71%) 11 , 3mm (Devitt 20%) 20 , and 3.5mm (Macchi 54% 17 , Coquart 82%) .…”
Section: "Injured Knee" Groupmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, because the ALL is a thin structure (thickness 1.4+/-0.6mm) 18 , it should be expected that clinical studies using more typical slice thicknesses (particularly if an interslice gap is present) have failed to show full visualisation reliably. In previous clinical MRI series the following slice thicknesses and rates of complete visualisation have been reported: 2.5mm (Helito 71%) 11 , 3mm (Devitt 20%) 20 , and 3.5mm (Macchi 54% 17 , Coquart 82%) .…”
Section: "Injured Knee" Groupmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The reason meniscal tears did not have a significant relationship with residual ALRI might have been because most of the meniscal tears were repaired instead of meniscectomy. Factors regarding anterolateral structure or iliotibial tract injury were not investigated in the present study because the sensitivity and specificity of detecting these damages with image evaluation remain controversial [22][23][24]. As for the ATT side-to-side difference, it showed weak negative association with absolute residual acceleration based on univariate analysis, however, multivariate analysis showed no correlation between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…3 In these situations, it is hard to say that one perspective is completely right and the other is completely wrong. Controversy was found regarding anatomy, 1,2,4-6 histology, 7-9 biomechanics, [10][11][12][13] radiological evaluation, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and reconstruction techniques. [21][22][23][24][25] Even though we have some data showing the benefits of ALL reconstruction, [26][27][28][29][30] it is not an absolute truth for most knee surgeons.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 2152mentioning
confidence: 99%