2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(12)70008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI in high risk women: benefits and problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, tumor size has been increasing over the last two decade, probably due to the improvements in radiological techniques. At the beginning of nineties, most of de novo metastatic patients were only clinically examined, whereas recently other techniques, including breast MRI, are routinely used to better define the real extension of the disease . An improvement in radiological investigations could also explain the significant reduction of single metastatic sites at the diagnosis observed in the last period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, tumor size has been increasing over the last two decade, probably due to the improvements in radiological techniques. At the beginning of nineties, most of de novo metastatic patients were only clinically examined, whereas recently other techniques, including breast MRI, are routinely used to better define the real extension of the disease . An improvement in radiological investigations could also explain the significant reduction of single metastatic sites at the diagnosis observed in the last period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of nineties, most of de novo metastatic patients were only clinically examined, whereas recently other techniques, including breast MRI, are routinely used to better define the real extension of the disease. [14][15][16] An improvement in radiological investigations could also explain the significant reduction of single metastatic sites at the diagnosis observed in the last period. In fact, in the period 2006-2009, about 45% of metastases were more likely to be multiple, probably due to a better study of the disease since the diagnosis with CT or PET scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%