2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0675-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy

Abstract: MR-GB shows a high detection rate of clinically significant PCa in patients with previous negative TRUS-GB and persisting suspicion for PCa.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
79
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
79
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the detection rate for clinically significant cancer in our study is 100 %. This is in accordance with and even higher than observed in the review of the literature [12,14,15,18,19,29]. This emphasizes the capability of MRGB to diagnose clinically significant cancer in patients after negative TRUS.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the detection rate for clinically significant cancer in our study is 100 %. This is in accordance with and even higher than observed in the review of the literature [12,14,15,18,19,29]. This emphasizes the capability of MRGB to diagnose clinically significant cancer in patients after negative TRUS.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is slightly lower compared to other MRGB studies reporting a diagnostic accuracy ranging between 38 -59 % [5, 7 -11, 13 -16, 18, 19, 26 -30]. This could have been due to the fact that we included consecutive patients in our study and not solely patients with a high risk profile for PCa [18]. In our study patients with a low risk profile for PCa had solely a suspicious finding on diagnostic MRI and low PSA and the majority had no or just one TRUS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Another out-of-bore approach uses the MR imaging in a cognitive manner, with the operator interpreting the previously acquired MR imaging information either as reported or by direct visualization and then performing a transrectal US sampling directed to the cognitively recalled locations (28). The transrectal MR imaging-guided biopsy studies (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) report cancer positivity rates of 8%-59%. Puech et al (41) compared cognitive and fusion techniques, showing no significant differences in biopsy yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI-guided biopsy can be utilized as a primary or secondary rebiopsy technique because the available data imply that there are higher detection rates from one MRI-guided biopsy compared to TRUS-guided repeat biopsies, up to the third rebiopsy (4). Only four 1.5 T MRI-guided biopsy studies, with a total of 176 patients, have been previously published (19,28,30,31). The reported overall detection rates ranged between 42% and 55% with a high proportion of transition zone cancers, accounting for 35% of removed cores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%