2005
DOI: 10.1109/titb.2005.847500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI Fuzzy Segmentation of Brain Tissue Using Neighborhood Attraction With Neural-Network Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
185
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome these drawbacks, Shen et al (2005) presented an improved algorithm. They found that the similarity function , is the key to segmentation success.…”
Section: Ifcm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To overcome these drawbacks, Shen et al (2005) presented an improved algorithm. They found that the similarity function , is the key to segmentation success.…”
Section: Ifcm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they lose the continuity from FCM, which inevitably introduce computation issues. Recently, Shen et al (2005) introduced a new extension of FCM algorithm, called improved FCM (IFCM). They introduced two influential factors in segmentation that address the neighbourhood attraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the complexity of the segmentation process automatic brain image segmentation requires several different approaches, where each approach utilizesdiverse induction ways such as region-based methods (Adams and Bischof, 1994;Alia et al, 2011;Chang and Li, 1994;Pohle and Toennies, 2001;Sijbers et al, 1997), classification-based methods (Bezdek et al, 1993;Dou et al, 2007;Kapur et al, 1996;Mokbel et al, 2000;Szilagyi et al, 2003;Van et al, 1999a;1999b;Wells et al, 1996;Xiaohe et al, 2008;Zhou and Rajapakse, 2008) boundary-based methods (Ashtari et al, 1990;Atkins and Mackiewich, 1998;Ji and Yan, 2002;McInerney and Terzopoulos, 1996) and others in (Beevi and Sathik, 2012;Clark et al, 1997;1998;Shen et al, 2005;Sonka et al, 1996;Cherfa et al, 2007;Zanaty and Aljahdali, 2010;Zhou and Bai, 2007). This intricacyhappens from the intrinsic nature, complicated structures of the MRI brain image (Alia et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main drawback of these applied algorithms is calculating the neighborhood term for each phase of iteration, that takes a long time (very timeconsuming) (Shen et al, 2005). New methods relies on the image histogram representation were suggested in the literature such as (Cai et al, 2007;Chen and Zhang, 2004;Chuang et al, 2006;Liao et al, 2008;Sijbers et al, 1997;Szilagyi et al, 2003;Liew and Hong, 2003) in order to solve time-consuming and decrease the computational demands of these algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%