MRI for collateral assessment pre-thrombectomy and association with outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose Various neuroimaging methods exist to assess the collateral circulation in stroke patients but much of the evidence is based on computed tomography. Our aim was to review the evidence for using magnetic resonance imaging for collateral status evaluation pre-thrombectomy and assess the impact of these methods on functional independence. Methods We systematically reviewed EMBASE and MEDLINE for studies that evaluated baseline collaterals using MRI pre-thrombectomy and conducted a meta-analysis to express the relationship between good collaterals (defined variably as the presence [good] vs absence [poor] or quality [ordinal scores binarized as good-moderate vs poor] of collaterals) and functional independence (modified Rankin score mRS≤2) at 90 days. Outcome data were presented as relative risk (RR, 95% confidence interval, 95%CI). We assessed for study heterogeneity, publication bias, and conducted subgroup analyses of different MRI methods and affected arterial territories. Results From 497 studies identified, we included 24 (1957 patients) for the qualitative synthesis, and 6 (479 patients) for the metanalysis. Good pre-thrombectomy collaterals were significantly associated with favorable outcome at 90 days (RR=1.91, 95%CI=1.36–2.68], p= 0.0002) with no difference between MRI methods and affected arterial territory subgroups. There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (I2=25%) among studies but there was evidence of publication bias. Conclusion In stroke patients treated with thrombectomy, good pre-treatment collaterals assessed using MRI are associated with double the rate of functional independence. However, we found evidence that relevant MR methods are heterogenous and under-reported. Greater standardization and clinical validation of MRI for collateral evaluation pre-thrombectomy are required.

Arterial Spin Labeling: Key Concepts and Progress Towards Use as a Clinical Tool

“…4 , a potential marker for improved outcome 42 – 44 that may contribute to selection and outcome in thrombectomy. 45 Developments that measure transit delay with multidelay ASL 46 or selectively label individual arterial vessels, 47 , 48 or combine some of these methods may further contribute to the assessment of collateral flow.…”