2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-015-0219-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI findings of extranodal malignant lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of interest, we came out with the result that HNSCC showed statistically significant higher mean ADC value (1.03 ± 0.20 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) than lymphoma (0.67 ± 0.09 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s). That was close to what Tomoko et al [10] reported in his study, where he stated that mean ADCs were smaller in lymphoma that SCC, using the high b factor of 1000 s/ mm 2 . In addition, Ichikawa et al [13] mentioned that ADC-based differentiation between lymphomas (0.503 ± 0.099 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) and oropharyngeal carcinomas (0.842 ± 0.164 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) was possible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of interest, we came out with the result that HNSCC showed statistically significant higher mean ADC value (1.03 ± 0.20 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) than lymphoma (0.67 ± 0.09 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s). That was close to what Tomoko et al [10] reported in his study, where he stated that mean ADCs were smaller in lymphoma that SCC, using the high b factor of 1000 s/ mm 2 . In addition, Ichikawa et al [13] mentioned that ADC-based differentiation between lymphomas (0.503 ± 0.099 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) and oropharyngeal carcinomas (0.842 ± 0.164 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) was possible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the current study, we figured out that there was no statistically significant difference between SCC and ML groups in T1WI and T2WI (in conventional imaging) which is equivalent to the study conducted by Tomoko et al [10] who showed that on both T1WI and T2WI, the signal intensities were not specific for ML or SCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Characteristic imaging findings that indicate ML in the maxilla or the mandible include permeable bone resorption on computed tomography (CT) images, low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the mass on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 7 ], and strong fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET–CT) [ 8 ]. In this study permeable bone resorption on CT was noted in 12/15 patients (80%) who underwent imaging of the maxilla, and 5/12 patients (41.7%) who underwent imaging of the mandible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also identified six articles from websites, citation searching, and suggestion. After applying the selection criteria, we identified eight articles with 440 patients (441 lesions) for systematic review and meta-analysis (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). The extracted data from the eight studies are outlined in Supplementary Tables 1−3.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%