2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0989-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI features of perianal fistulas: is there a difference between Crohn’s and non-Crohn’s patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing our patients, we found that 61.0% (83/136) presented with complex fistulas, whereas high fistulas were uncommon, only 8.1% (11/136). Oliveira et al showed that the characteristics of perianal fistulas were actually similar in the CD and non-CD populations, as evidenced by abscess incidence, volume, and signs of fistula activity (high signal on T2WI images as well as focal enhancement); however, they also found that compared to the non-CD population, the CD population was younger (28.6 ± 14.9 y vs. 42.4 ± 14.7 y) and rectal inflammation was more common (30.2% vs. 6.7%) [ 35 ]. The mean age of our patients was 27.5 ± 10.2 years and the incidence of rectal involvement was 34.6% (47/136), similar to the CD population of Oliveira et al ( p = 0.51 and 0.49, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing our patients, we found that 61.0% (83/136) presented with complex fistulas, whereas high fistulas were uncommon, only 8.1% (11/136). Oliveira et al showed that the characteristics of perianal fistulas were actually similar in the CD and non-CD populations, as evidenced by abscess incidence, volume, and signs of fistula activity (high signal on T2WI images as well as focal enhancement); however, they also found that compared to the non-CD population, the CD population was younger (28.6 ± 14.9 y vs. 42.4 ± 14.7 y) and rectal inflammation was more common (30.2% vs. 6.7%) [ 35 ]. The mean age of our patients was 27.5 ± 10.2 years and the incidence of rectal involvement was 34.6% (47/136), similar to the CD population of Oliveira et al ( p = 0.51 and 0.49, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perianal abscess is caused by infection of the anal gland located between the sphincter muscles. e ways of infection include blockage of the anal glands, inability to drain the secretion of the anal glands, fluid accumulation in the glands, infection of the anal glands (between the sphincter muscles), the formation of swelling (infection source), and spread along with the conjoint longitudinal muscle to the perianal space [4]. e diagnosis of perianal abscess and anal canal stenosis is clear before surgery, and the location of the perianal opening, abscess range, anal fistula trend, and its relationship with surrounding muscle tissue are clearly defined, which is of great significance for the selection of surgical methods and the protection of anal physiological functions [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, MRE is generally preferred over CT to limit the increased risk of cancer in patients with CD. Additionally, MRE has been shown to be the most sensitive technique for detecting active disease, the perianal complications, and bowel wall fibrosis 4–6 . However, the administration of gadolinium should be kept in mind in patients requiring frequent MRE examination to preclude tissue deposition and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%