RESULTS An underlying aetiology was identified in 354 infants (93.7%). The most commonaetiologies identified were hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (46%), intracranial haemorrhage (12.2%), and perinatal arterial ischaemic stroke (10.6%). When comparing MRI with cUS in these 354 infants MRI showed new findings which did not become apparent on cUS, contributing to a diagnosis in 42 (11.9%) infants and providing additional information to cUS, contributing to a diagnosis in 141 (39.8%). cUS alone would have allowed a diagnosis in only 37.9% of infants (134/354).INTERPRETATION Cerebral MRI contributed to making a diagnosis in the majority of infants.In 11.9% of infants the diagnosis would have been missed if only cUS were used and cerebral MRI added significantly to the information obtained in 39.8% of infants. These data suggest that cerebral MRI should be performed in all newborn infants presenting with EEGor aEEG-confirmed seizures.Neonatal seizures are associated with high mortality (21-24%) 1,2 and morbidity rates (25-35%). 3 No evidence-based guidelines for the evaluation of neonatal seizures exist, 4 but it is likely that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would provide the most useful information. 5,6 MRI is now considered the criterion standard for diagnosing brain injury and developmental disorders and for determining the prognosis in neonates presenting with seizures. 4 Many studies have reported on brain imaging and neonatal seizures, but most focused on MRI data in small groups of infants with a specific underlying problem. Only a few studies have reported on neuroimaging findings in infants with neonatal seizures. 3,[7][8][9] The aim of this study was to assess the aetiologies and additional value of MRI compared with cranial ultrasonography (cUS) in a retrospective study of a large cohort of term-born and near-term-born infants with neonatal seizures. Our hypothesis was that MRI would make an important contribution to the diagnostic process.
METHOD PatientsIn this retrospective study, infants were included if they had a gestational age of 35 weeks or more and clinical and/or subclinical neonatal seizures, confirmed by amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) or (March 1999-October 2013. Infants were excluded if they had clinical seizures without confirmation by either aEEG or standard EEG. Infants were identified using a local database on discharge diagnoses using 'seizures' and 'convulsions' as search terms. These data were compared with a local neuroimaging database to identify those who underwent cUS and MRI during the same admission period. Subsequently, the medical records and discharge summaries were used to check whether or not seizures had been confirmed by EEG or aEEG.No permission was required from the hospital's medical ethics committee for this retrospective anonymous data analysis.
Amplitude-integrated electroencephalographyContinuous aEEG recordings were routinely used in infants at risk of or with suspected neonatal seizures. Standard EEG was performed when aEEG was inconclusive,...