2020
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1701100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI evaluation of endopelvic fascial swelling and analysis of influencing factors in patients with uterine fibroids after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation

Abstract: 2020) MRI evaluation of endopelvic fascial swelling and analysis of influencing factors in patients with uterine fibroids after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No adverse events of class D, E, or F occurred in this study. And the incidence of this study was similar to previous studies ( 6 , 10 , 39 ). The incidence of postoperative lower abdominal pain, sacrococcygeal pain, and lower limb pain/numbness was higher in the group with pelvic injury than in the group without injury, which was considered to be due to the fact that more energy was required for fibroid ablation in the injury group, and the corresponding soft tissues and nerves were irradiated at an increased dose and at an increased treatment intensity, thus likely causing an increased incidence of corresponding adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…No adverse events of class D, E, or F occurred in this study. And the incidence of this study was similar to previous studies ( 6 , 10 , 39 ). The incidence of postoperative lower abdominal pain, sacrococcygeal pain, and lower limb pain/numbness was higher in the group with pelvic injury than in the group without injury, which was considered to be due to the fact that more energy was required for fibroid ablation in the injury group, and the corresponding soft tissues and nerves were irradiated at an increased dose and at an increased treatment intensity, thus likely causing an increased incidence of corresponding adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, in our study, there were no such adverse effects lending further evidence to the safety of the procedure. Care may be required in HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids located on the posterior uterine wall or in retroverted uteri, close to the surface of the sacral bone adjacent to lumbosacral nerves, to prevent sciatic nerve damage or sacral injury [37,38]. Occurring in approximately 4-14% of patients, such transient irritation is one of the most frequently reported side effects, along with vaginal discharge (6%) [19,27,37,38], which was reported in 10% of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Care may be required in HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids located on the posterior uterine wall or in retroverted uteri, close to the surface of the sacral bone adjacent to lumbosacral nerves, to prevent sciatic nerve damage or sacral injury [37,38]. Occurring in approximately 4-14% of patients, such transient irritation is one of the most frequently reported side effects, along with vaginal discharge (6%) [19,27,37,38], which was reported in 10% of our patients. Serious side effects like skin burns (up to 2%) or even small bowel perforations (0.1%) are possible but have been only rarely reported [7,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The average NPVR was 71.5 ± 18.4%, which is slightly lower than the results of other studies on HIFU therapy for undefined fibroids adjacent to the sacrococcygeal region. 16 , 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%