2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI diagnosis of dural sinus—Cortical venous thrombosis: Immediate post-contrast 3D GRE T1-weighted imaging versus unenhanced MR venography and conventional MR sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the variation in venous anatomy and the phenomenon of flow gaps, it is sometimes impossible to exclude CVT on MRV [3,15]. For the identification of the intraluminal thrombus, we found that 3D T1 SPACE can show the thrombus as evident high signal intensity in the subacute stage of CVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the variation in venous anatomy and the phenomenon of flow gaps, it is sometimes impossible to exclude CVT on MRV [3,15]. For the identification of the intraluminal thrombus, we found that 3D T1 SPACE can show the thrombus as evident high signal intensity in the subacute stage of CVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The appearance of a thrombus on an MRI, again, depends on the age of the clot. Within the first few days a clot appears iso-intense of T1 weighted imaging and hypo-intense on T2 weighted imaging, owed to the presence of de-oxyhemoglobin (9,54,57). After approximately 1 week, the presence of methemoglobin gives the clot a hyper-intense appearance on all sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Signs suggestive of DVST on standard brain MR imaging are reported in the literature with highly variable diagnostic accuracy and can be difficult to interpret in daily practice. 2,[6][7][8] Understanding the diagnostic performance of routine MR imaging for the evaluation of DVST is especially important when DVST is not clinically suspected or CT or MR venography has not been ordered. A false-positive inter-pretation of DVST based on routine MR imaging will lead to unnecessary patient anxiety, require further imaging and associated health care costs, and increase patient risk from exposure to contrast media or radiation from CTV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%