2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI-detectable changes in mouse brain structure induced by voluntary exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rodents models, such as transgenic mice, those with pharmacologically-induced neural lesions, and those selectively bred to engage in high or low amount of wheel running or other PA, have helped elucidate the brain regions and molecular mechanisms regulating PA. Because of the strong conservation in brain structure and physiology between rodents and humans (Howdeshell 2002; Rice and Barone 2000), the same brain areas likely facilitate PA in humans. The brain regions in rodents that are essential in modulating this behavior include the striatum, NAc, hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, locus coeruleus, cerebellum, and pons (Ambrogi Lorenzini et al 1991; Andrzejewski et al 2004; Basso and Morrell 2015; Beninger et al 2009; Bronikowski et al 2004; Cahill et al 2015; Dubreucq et al 2010; Kolb et al 2013; Korczynski and Fonberg 1979; Monroe et al 2014; Nonneman and Corwin 1981; Rhodes et al 2003; Roberts et al 2014; Ruegsegger et al 2016; Ruegsegger et al 2015; Tarr et al 2004; Teske et al 2013; Werme et al 2002; Yim and Mogenson 1989). The currently known identified genes and pathways in the brain that are particularly important in stimulating or suppressing this behavioral response include Fos/DeltaFosB (Correa et al 2016; Rhodes et al 2003; Werme et al 2002), CB1 receptors (Dubreucq et al 2010), NMDA receptor (Andrzejewski et al 2004; Yim and Mogenson 1989), dopaminergic (Monroe et al 2014; Roberts et al 2013; Roberts et al 2012; Waters et al 2013; Yang et al 2012)(Park et al Physiology & Behavior, Resubmitted )(Correa et al 2016), opioid (Ruegsegger et al 2015), and leptin (Matheny et al 2009; Ruegsegger et al 2016) signaling pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rodents models, such as transgenic mice, those with pharmacologically-induced neural lesions, and those selectively bred to engage in high or low amount of wheel running or other PA, have helped elucidate the brain regions and molecular mechanisms regulating PA. Because of the strong conservation in brain structure and physiology between rodents and humans (Howdeshell 2002; Rice and Barone 2000), the same brain areas likely facilitate PA in humans. The brain regions in rodents that are essential in modulating this behavior include the striatum, NAc, hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, locus coeruleus, cerebellum, and pons (Ambrogi Lorenzini et al 1991; Andrzejewski et al 2004; Basso and Morrell 2015; Beninger et al 2009; Bronikowski et al 2004; Cahill et al 2015; Dubreucq et al 2010; Kolb et al 2013; Korczynski and Fonberg 1979; Monroe et al 2014; Nonneman and Corwin 1981; Rhodes et al 2003; Roberts et al 2014; Ruegsegger et al 2016; Ruegsegger et al 2015; Tarr et al 2004; Teske et al 2013; Werme et al 2002; Yim and Mogenson 1989). The currently known identified genes and pathways in the brain that are particularly important in stimulating or suppressing this behavioral response include Fos/DeltaFosB (Correa et al 2016; Rhodes et al 2003; Werme et al 2002), CB1 receptors (Dubreucq et al 2010), NMDA receptor (Andrzejewski et al 2004; Yim and Mogenson 1989), dopaminergic (Monroe et al 2014; Roberts et al 2013; Roberts et al 2012; Waters et al 2013; Yang et al 2012)(Park et al Physiology & Behavior, Resubmitted )(Correa et al 2016), opioid (Ruegsegger et al 2015), and leptin (Matheny et al 2009; Ruegsegger et al 2016) signaling pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In return, PA can alter brain plasticity, including promoting neuro-generative, -adpative, and – protective responses (Reviewed in (Dishman et al 2006)). Ex vivo high resolution 3D MR imaging analysis of mice that previously engaged in four weeks of voluntary exercise revealed that this behavior is associated with brain regions required for normal motor function and learning and memory, such as the hippocampus, dentate gyrus, stratum granulosum of the dentate gyrus, cingulate cortex, olivary complex, inferior cerebellar peduncles and other regions of the cerebellum (Cahill et al 2015). Prior to the initiation of PA, MRI analyses of select brain regions, including the striatum, hippocampus, and pons, are considered excellent predictors of later amount of time engaged in this behavior.…”
Section: Brain Regions Genes and Pathways Regulating Voluntary Physmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/183004 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online MR images were obtained in-house at the Mouse Imaging Centre in a multiple mouse imaging setup (Lerch et al, 2011a) and as part of other studies' wildtype groups (Ellegood et al, 2015;Cahill et al, 2015). All 153 images were T2-weighted and obtained ex-vivo on a 7T Varian MR scanner, with brains perfused with a gadolinium-based contrast agent 150 before imaging (de Guzman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Animals and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High resolution sMRI in rodents can provide an excellent readout of anatomical brain changes in mice following nerve injury, housing in an enriched environment, or maze training and such changes are also associated with cellular and molecular changes (Seminowicz et al, 2009; Lerch et al, 2011b; Cahill et al, 2015; Scholz et al, 2015a). However, it is still unclear whether sMRI can be utilized in mice to reveal volumetric regional brain changes following tooth extraction, whether it can detect volumetric regional brain differences in mice of different genetic background, and whether it can be utilized as a phenotyping method to identify genetic sources for inter-individual differences in brain plasticity following tooth loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%