2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI breast cancer diagnosis hybrid approach using adaptive ant-based segmentation and multilayer perceptron neural networks classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curvelet frequency is used to improve the ef iciency (Francis et al, 2014). MRI breast cancer diagnosis hybrid approach using adaptive antbased segmentation and multilayer perceptron neural networks classi ier hybrid approach that combines the advantages of fuzzy sets, ant-based clustering and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLPNN) classi ier, in conjunction with statisticalbased feature extraction technique (Hassanien et al, 2014).…”
Section: Figure 2: Automated Diagnosis System For Detection Of Breastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curvelet frequency is used to improve the ef iciency (Francis et al, 2014). MRI breast cancer diagnosis hybrid approach using adaptive antbased segmentation and multilayer perceptron neural networks classi ier hybrid approach that combines the advantages of fuzzy sets, ant-based clustering and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLPNN) classi ier, in conjunction with statisticalbased feature extraction technique (Hassanien et al, 2014).…”
Section: Figure 2: Automated Diagnosis System For Detection Of Breastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hassanien et al [12] introduces a hybrid approach with a combination of the benefits of fuzzy sets, ant-based clustering and multilayer perception neural networks (MLPNN) classifier, in conjunction with statisticalbased feature extraction technique. They developed a system with an algorithm that was based on type-II fuzzy sets for enhancing the contrast of the input images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2(Tab. 2) (References in Table 2: Al-Faris et al, 2014[6]; Kim et al, 2014[75]; Dheeba et al, 2014[34]; Al-Faris et al, 2014[7]; Hassanien et al, 2014[57]; Kannan et al, 2011[73]) a few examples of segmentation methods in breast CAD systems collected are shown. …”
Section: Cornerstones Of a Cad Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%