2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/aa7ef2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI-based electric properties tomography with a quasi-Newton approach

Abstract: Magnetic resonance electric properties tomography is a non-destructive imaging modality that maps the spatial distribution of the electrical conductivity and permittivity of the human body using standard clinical magnetic resonance imaging systems. From the B + 1 magnetic field maps and the local form of the Maxwell equations, several schemes have been derived to provide direct approximated formulas but they suffer from instabilities. In this paper, we propose to address it as an inverse problem solved by a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, improved permittivity results have very recently been reported by using newly formulated EPT reconstruction methods on B1+ maps from EM simulations. For example, using a quasi‐Newton approach, Rahimov et al have shown a permittivity precision of ~20% in the brain . In Guo et al, the std in permittivity, converted from the reported interquartile ranges according to the procedure in Wan et al, was ~8 rel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, improved permittivity results have very recently been reported by using newly formulated EPT reconstruction methods on B1+ maps from EM simulations. For example, using a quasi‐Newton approach, Rahimov et al have shown a permittivity precision of ~20% in the brain . In Guo et al, the std in permittivity, converted from the reported interquartile ranges according to the procedure in Wan et al, was ~8 rel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several techniques for B1+ field mapping have been used in EPT studies (e.g., standard spin echo, gradient echo, and balanced steady‐state free precession for phase mapping and actual flip angle imaging (AFI) and double‐angle methods for false|B1+false| mapping) and numerous algorithms have been proposed to disentangle both properties from the B1+ field . Based on measured field maps, in vivo conductivity maps have been derived (e.g., see previous works) and also preliminarily tested for clinical oncologic applications, for example, in brain, breast, and uterine cervix .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further improve the effectiveness of the procedure, additional information (other than spatial priors, such as for example physical feasibility of the achieved EP values [26]) can be exploited. Enforcing these latter can be eventually achieved by modifying the functional to be minimized by adding suitable penalty terms.…”
Section: New Estimation Of Eps Via Mri/ct Based Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, up to now they have been proved to be effective only for over-simplified scenarios consisting of at most three biological tissues. Another example of regularization based on MRI/CT spatial priors is introduced in [26]. However, in this latter the EPs tomography is performed by processing the signal from MRI scanner by means a Newton-Kantorovich inversion scheme, which requires both the solution of several forward problems as well as the solution of several linearized inverse problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse ept approaches are generally based on global integral forms of Maxwell's equations and obtain the eps by iteratively minimizing a cost function measuring the discrepancy between the "measured" B + 1 and modelled B + 1 [109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118]. Many contributions have solved this inverse problem with the contrast source inversion (csi) method [109,[114][115][116][117][118] and are reviewed in [119].…”
Section: Inverse Eptmentioning
confidence: 99%