2020
DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020190024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local-Regional Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several HCC-specific radiological response classification systems have been developed, including the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and the LI-RADS-Treatment Response (LI-RADS-TR) [ 205 , 206 ]. Compared to conventional tumor response evaluation criteria, LI-RADS-TR and mRECIST focus on the presence of viable contrast-enhancing HCC tissue rather than changes in total tumor size [ 207 ]. The interpretation of radiologic findings after locoregional therapy may be challenging, due to the presence of treatment-induced changes in the peritumoral liver parenchyma, which vary among different therapies [ 207 ].…”
Section: Imaging Assessment Of Hcc Following Percutaneous Locoregiona...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several HCC-specific radiological response classification systems have been developed, including the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and the LI-RADS-Treatment Response (LI-RADS-TR) [ 205 , 206 ]. Compared to conventional tumor response evaluation criteria, LI-RADS-TR and mRECIST focus on the presence of viable contrast-enhancing HCC tissue rather than changes in total tumor size [ 207 ]. The interpretation of radiologic findings after locoregional therapy may be challenging, due to the presence of treatment-induced changes in the peritumoral liver parenchyma, which vary among different therapies [ 207 ].…”
Section: Imaging Assessment Of Hcc Following Percutaneous Locoregiona...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional tumor response evaluation criteria, LI-RADS-TR and mRECIST focus on the presence of viable contrast-enhancing HCC tissue rather than changes in total tumor size [ 207 ]. The interpretation of radiologic findings after locoregional therapy may be challenging, due to the presence of treatment-induced changes in the peritumoral liver parenchyma, which vary among different therapies [ 207 ].…”
Section: Imaging Assessment Of Hcc Following Percutaneous Locoregiona...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After SBRT, APHE with or without “washout” can persist for up to a year, and even longer, but these imaging features gradually decrease over time[ 51 ] (Figure 6 ). Early post treatment, geographic APHE surrounding the treated tumor is a common finding and likely represents hyperemia; this eventually converts to progressive delayed phase geographic enhancement, likely secondary to radiation fibrosis, usually with associated findings of capsular retraction and peripheral intrahepatic biliary dilatation[ 52 ].…”
Section: Expected Post Treatment Imaging Appearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). 29 Importantly, persistent central arterial hyperenhancement can be seen longer than 3 months in tumors treated by TARE, with progressive decrease and eventual lack of enhancement over time. Imaging features suggestive of residual tumor after TARE include new or enlarging nodular or mass‐like APHE within or around the treated tumor and growth over time, particularly more than 6 months after treatment 29 …”
Section: Radiographic Evaluation After Liver Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%