1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00418-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI artifacts following anterior cervical diskectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, both ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic substances can distort the local magnetic field and create a susceptibility artifact 3 . A susceptibility artifact occurs when there is a local deformity in the magnetic field due to magnetization of a tissue and results in spatial misregistration 1,3–5 . Magnetic susceptibility artifact also is characterized by large areas of signal void caused by spatial misregistration and a crescentic bright rim (inflection zone) due to overlap of signals from displaced structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, both ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic substances can distort the local magnetic field and create a susceptibility artifact 3 . A susceptibility artifact occurs when there is a local deformity in the magnetic field due to magnetization of a tissue and results in spatial misregistration 1,3–5 . Magnetic susceptibility artifact also is characterized by large areas of signal void caused by spatial misregistration and a crescentic bright rim (inflection zone) due to overlap of signals from displaced structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on postoperative MR images is documented in humans 1,2,6,7 . Susceptibility artifacts can be anticipated when metal implants are inserted 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MRI was considered the most useful tool and should be the modality of choice when determining causes of failed back surgery and when evaluating recurrent pain after lumbar interbody fusion. 2 However, the presence of artifacts can limit the usefulness of MRI alone, 3,4 and, at times, it can lead to misdiagnosis and malpractice, especially if the localization of the recurrent symptoms corresponds to that of the "false pathology" caused by artifacts. In our case, we did not even notice the presence of artifacts in the initial evaluation, and we mistook the artifact for pathology because the clinical symptom was well explained by the abnormal signal on MRI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%