MRI and CT imaging for preoperative target volume delineation in breast-conserving therapy

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate tumor bed delineation after breast-conserving surgery is important. However, consistency among observers on standard postoperative radiotherapy planning CT is low and volumes can be large due to seroma formation. A preoperative delineation of the tumor might be more consistent. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the consistency of preoperative target volume delineation on CT and MRI for breast-conserving radiotherapy.MethodsTumors were delineated on preoperative contrast-enhanced (CE) CT and newly developed 3D CE-MR images, by four breast radiation oncologists. Clinical target volumes (CTVs) were created by addition of a 1.5 cm margin around the tumor, excluding skin and chest wall. Consistency in target volume delineation was expressed by the interobserver variability. Therefore, the conformity index (CI), center of mass distance (dCOM) and volumes were calculated. Tumor characteristics on CT and MRI were scored by an experienced breast radiologist.ResultsPreoperative tumor delineation resulted in a high interobserver agreement with a high median CI for the CTV, for both CT (0.80) and MRI (0.84). The tumor was missed on CT in 2/14 patients (14%). Leaving these 2 patients out of the analysis, CI was higher on MRI compared to CT for the GTV (p < 0.001) while not for the CTV (CT (0.82) versus MRI (0.84), p = 0.123). The dCOM did not differ between CT and MRI. The median CTV was 48 cm3 (range 28–137 cm3) on CT and 59 cm3 (range 30–153 cm3) on MRI (p < 0.001). Tumor shapes and margins were rated as more irregular and spiculated on CE-MRI.ConclusionsThis study showed that preoperative target volume delineation resulted in small target volumes with a high consistency among observers. MRI appeared to be necessary for tumor detection and the visualization of irregularities and spiculations. Regarding the tumor delineation itself, no clinically relevant differences in interobserver variability were observed. These results will be used to study the potential for future MRI-guided and neoadjuvant radiotherapy.Trial registrationInternational Clinical Trials Registry Platform NTR3198.

Considerable interobserver variation in delineation of pancreatic cancer on 3DCT and 4DCT: a multi-institutional study

“…Previous studies in pancreatic cancer also showed a large interobserver variation on 3DCT with a comparable ratio of largest to smallest GTV of 3–9 [14–16]. The observed interobserver variation is large compared to studies performed in several other organs such as breast, larynx, and rectal cancer, which reported a CI of 0.6–0.82 [9, 22, 23]. …”

A review of interventions to reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology

“…In breast cancer, tumour bed delineation was more consistently performed on pre‐operative CT scans . Breast MRI improved IOV in delineation of tumour bed in one of two studies and GTV in another, but there was no improvement in CTV variability in the three studies which assessed this . The use of registered PET scans reduced IOV in all three lung cancer studies and in all four rectal cancer studies, although this was confined to rectal GTV in two studies .…”

Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy

“…MRI can distinguish breast tumor tissue with far better accuracy than CT-based imaging-considering the advent of MRIgRT, this would make MRI a good solution for online ART implementation. 80,81 One M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19 possible drawback to MRIgRT for the breast is the presence of the electron return effect due to the presence of a magnetic field acting on the beam's dose deposition. This may lead to an elevation of skin dose in the region surrounding the treatment volume.…”