2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-019-0541-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR safety assessment of active implantable medical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average speci c energy absorption rate (SAR) during the scan can be estimated by dividing the time-average input RF power by the sample mass [13]. Therefore, the experimental average SAR is well below the guideline value [14]. We demonstrate that the transnasal coil is unlikely to cause thermal damage to the patient and is safe to be used in the clinical environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The average speci c energy absorption rate (SAR) during the scan can be estimated by dividing the time-average input RF power by the sample mass [13]. Therefore, the experimental average SAR is well below the guideline value [14]. We demonstrate that the transnasal coil is unlikely to cause thermal damage to the patient and is safe to be used in the clinical environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating viability of repeated daily MR imaging sessions at 0.35 T with off-label scanning of a cochlear implant. Compared with prior studies 2 , 5 that demonstrated feasibility on diagnostic MR scanners with cochlear implants, patients treated with MRgRT are potentially at higher risk because of the requirement to undergo multiple MRI scans at the time of simulation as well as before each treatment day. As such, minimizing the number of fractions is particularly advantageous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MR clearance workflow ( Fig. 3 ) is designed to clear each implant and proceed with imaging/treatment based on known/unknown origin, passive/active nature of the implant, 5 and vendor on/off-label usage instructions. We implemented this specific protocol as a foundational safety component of our MRgRT program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can concentrate the RF power, potentially causing high-power depositions in the vicinity of these objects. Severe MRI-related RF heating of electrically conducting structures and associated risks have been shown for interventional guide wires [12], implanted electrodes for deep brain stimulators [13] and cardiac pacemaker leads [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%