Abstract:Compatibility of mechatronic devices with the MR environment has been a very challenging engineering task. After over a decade of developments, we report the successful translation to clinical trials of our MR Safe robot technology.
MrBot is a 6-degree-of-freedom, pneumatically actuated robot for transperineal prostate percutaneous access, built exclusively of electrically nonconductive and nonmagnetic materials. Its extensive pre-clinical tests have been previously reported. Here, we present the latest techno… Show more
“…Only a single targeting device for robotic-assisted MR imaging is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (56). These devices are mainly used in research settings, and therefore are only briefly discussed here.…”
Systematic transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy is the standard approach for histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, this technique has multiple limitations because of its inability to accurately visualize and target prostate lesions. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate is more reliably able to localize significant prostate cancer. Targeted prostate biopsy by using MR imaging may thus help to reduce false-negative results and improve risk assessment. Several commercial devices are now available for targeted prostate biopsy, including in-gantry MR imaging-targeted biopsy and real-time transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy systems. This article reviews the current status of MR imaging-targeted biopsy platforms, including technical considerations, as well as advantages and challenges of each technique. RSNA, 2017.
“…Only a single targeting device for robotic-assisted MR imaging is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (56). These devices are mainly used in research settings, and therefore are only briefly discussed here.…”
Systematic transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy is the standard approach for histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, this technique has multiple limitations because of its inability to accurately visualize and target prostate lesions. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate is more reliably able to localize significant prostate cancer. Targeted prostate biopsy by using MR imaging may thus help to reduce false-negative results and improve risk assessment. Several commercial devices are now available for targeted prostate biopsy, including in-gantry MR imaging-targeted biopsy and real-time transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy systems. This article reviews the current status of MR imaging-targeted biopsy platforms, including technical considerations, as well as advantages and challenges of each technique. RSNA, 2017.
“…21 In addition, there is a development of other robot devices that are integrated with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system for transperineal prostate percutaneous access, which is called MrBot robot. 22 The clinical application of MrBot has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration because of its accuracy and safety for patients. Although these CT-and MRI-integrated navigation systems promote safe and accurate procedures, the renal access during PCNL is mainly performed under either fluoroscopic or US guidance rather than under CT or MRI guidance.…”
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted fluoroscopy-guided (RAG) puncture and to compare RAG puncture, utilizing a novel robot system for percutaneous renal access, with ultrasound-guided (USG) puncture. Materials and Methods: We conducted a benchtop study with a renal phantom model using the automated needle targeting with an X-ray system. Seventeen urologists participated in this study and performed RAG and USG phantom punctures. The number of needle punctures, device setup time, and fluoroscopic exposure duration were recorded for the analyses. Results: The single puncture success rates of the RAG and USG punctures were 100% and 70.6%, respectively (p = 0.021). The median needle puncture time of RAG puncture was 24% shorter than that of USG puncture (35.0 vs 46.0 seconds; p < 0.001), and the median device setup time of RAG puncture was a minute longer than that of USG puncture (93.0 vs 30.5 seconds; p < 0.001). The median duration of fluoroscopic exposure of RAG puncture was longer than that of USG puncture (38.0 vs 6.5 seconds; p < 0.001). The surgeon's self-assessment results demonstrated that the participating urologists found RAG puncture to be safer and have better visibility than USG puncture; they were also more satisfied with RAG puncture. Subanalysis revealed that, in the RAG group, the attending surgeons had shorter total procedural time than the residents (p = 0.045). Conclusion: RAG puncture showed comparable results and accuracy rates with USG puncture for renal access.
“…As these techniques mature and allow an ever more detailed morphological and functional assessment of tissues and organs, researchers and clinicians are increasingly eager to employ CT and MR imaging not only for diagnostics but also during treatment in image‐guided interventions . Examples for these procedures under intraoperative CT or MRI visualization include image‐guided prostate therapy and biopsies, dynamic CT angiography, vascular interventions, neurosurgery, and rehabilitation monitoring …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these imaging techniques can show organ functions, for example, brain activity using functional MRI (fMRI), 1-3 organ perfusion using arterial spin labeling MRI, 4 or metabolic activity using positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. 5,6 As these techniques mature and allow an ever more detailed morphological and functional assessment of tissues and organs, researchers and clinicians are increasingly eager to employ CT and MR imaging not only for diagnostics but also during treatment in image-guided interventions. 7 Examples for these procedures under intraoperative CT or MRI visualization include image-guided prostate therapy 8 and biopsies, 9,10 dynamic CT angiography, 11 vascular interventions, 12 neurosurgery, 13 and rehabilitation monitoring. 14,15 Performing image-guided interventions is a challenging task.…”
Purpose
Three‐dimensional (3D) printing allows for the fabrication of medical devices with complex geometries, such as soft actuators and robots that can be used in image‐guided interventions. This study investigates flexible and rigid 3D‐printing materials in terms of their impact on multimodal medical imaging.
Methods
The generation of artifacts in clinical computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was evaluated for six flexible and three rigid materials, each with a cubical and a cylindrical geometry, and for one exemplary flexible fluidic actuator. Additionally, CT Hounsfield units (HU) were quantified for various parameter sets iterating peak voltage, x‐ray tube current, slice thickness, and convolution kernel.
Results
We found the image artifacts caused by the materials to be negligible in both CT and MR images. The HU values mainly depended on the elemental composition of the materials and applied peak voltage was ranging between 80 and 140 kVp. Flexible, nonsilicone‐based materials were ranged between 51 and 114 HU. The voltage dependency was less than 29 HU. Flexible, silicone‐based materials were ranged between 60 and 365 HU. The voltage‐dependent influence was as large as 172 HU. Rigid materials ranged between −69 and 132 HU. The voltage‐dependent influence was <33 HU.
Conclusions
All tested materials may be employed for devices placed in the field of view during CT and MR imaging as no significant artifacts were measured. Moreover, the material selection in CT could be based on the desired visibility of the material depending on the application. Given the wide availability of the tested materials, we expect our results to have a positive impact on the development of devices and robots for image‐guided interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.