“…This loss-aversion's perspective implies that people are risk-seeking when confronted with loss-framed information associated with costs and risk-averse or risk-avoidant when presented with gain-framed information associated with benefits (De Bruijn, 2018). As such, negatively framed message is more motivating than positively framed message in changing behaviors that are considered risky, such as personal health issues (Meyerowitz & Chaiken, 1987), whereas positively framed message is more motivating than negatively framed message for low-risk behaviors (O'Keefe & Jensen, 2009), such as pro-environmental Chou and Lien (2012) Using regulatory-framed advertising appeals to promote travel destinations Promotion-framed appeal is more preferred for spatially distant travel destination, prevention-framed appeal is more preferable for spatially near travel destination Daryanto et al (2009) Using regulatory focus to influence buying intention in private health insurance Promotion-focused communication is more effective for premium deductible (discount) policy, preventionfocused communication is more effective for premium copayment (cost-sharing) policy Geng et al (2018) Examining impact of regulatory focus on restaurant employee creativity Promotion focus is positively associated with creativity, prevention focus is negatively associated with creativity Wang et al (2013) Using regulatory focus to understand outcomes of customized services Prevention focus leads to more retained options in the final customized offering than promotion focus behavior Shao et al, 2020). When individuals perceive high risk related to health behaviors, they are inclined to focus on the adverse health outcomes that represent the significant unpleasant aspects of the situation (Park, 2012).…”