“…This clinical pelvimetry has been reported to have limited value in identifying women at risk of dystocia (Rozenholc et al) and is prone to subjectivity (Tita), reason why a more objective and reliable method is needed (Lenhard et al, 2009(Lenhard et al, , 2010. Different imaging studies have been used for pelvimetry to identify the small pelvic diameters, examples include: ultrasound (Daghighi et al, 2013), X rays (Harper et al, 2013;Korhonen et al, 2014), computed tomography (CT) (Lenhard et al, 2009(Lenhard et al, , 2010 and magnetic resonance (Huerta-Enochian et al, 2006;Korhonen et al, 2014;Spörri et al, 2002). CT has been described as the study with the most accurate and reliable picture for high quality pelvimetry (Herrmann et al, 1990;Lenhard et al, 2009Lenhard et al, , 2010.…”