1988
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198801000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR Imaging of Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Encouraging reports [12,14,16] on stag ing of bladder tumors were published, taking advantage from its multiplan applicability. Tumors of bladder base and bladder dome could be better visualized; the supe rior soft-tissue contrast permitted the evaluation of tu mor contact to adjacent structures such as prostate and seminal vesicles [3], Staging accuracy rates of up to 85% were reported [11,12], Nevertheless, scepticism is justi fied because technical details and strengths of magnetic fields varied significantly (magnetic fields from 0.15 to 1.5 T).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Encouraging reports [12,14,16] on stag ing of bladder tumors were published, taking advantage from its multiplan applicability. Tumors of bladder base and bladder dome could be better visualized; the supe rior soft-tissue contrast permitted the evaluation of tu mor contact to adjacent structures such as prostate and seminal vesicles [3], Staging accuracy rates of up to 85% were reported [11,12], Nevertheless, scepticism is justi fied because technical details and strengths of magnetic fields varied significantly (magnetic fields from 0.15 to 1.5 T).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without contrast material, bladder wall and tumor tissue may be differentiated best in T2-weighted images [14]. Since the signal/noise ratio and the resulting spatial resolution of T1-weighted images is higher, contrastenhanced T1 -weighted images made a more precise eval uation of tumor extent possible ( fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,7,10). Nevertheless SE images show a poor contrast between tumor and bladder wall, mainly on TI-weighted images ( 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,7,10). Nevertheless SE images show a poor contrast between tumor and bladder wall, mainly on TI-weighted images ( 10). Moreover, on T2-weighted images, the chemical-shift artifact occurring at the water/fat interface (bladder/perivesical fat) in the direction of the readout gradient, represents an intrinsic limit of the method in evaluating the bladder wall (6, 1 I).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR imaging of the bladder is usually performed with Tland T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) images, which benefit from the natural contrast of the muscular bladder wall, the urine content, and the pelvic fat on the outer vesical border (1,3,7,10). Nevertheless SE images show a poor contrast between tumor and bladder wall, mainly on Tl-weighted images (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%