2012
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR imaging of the amide‐proton transfer effect and the pH‐insensitive nuclear overhauser effect at 9.4 T

Abstract: The amide proton transfer (APT) effect has emerged as a unique endogenous molecular imaging contrast mechanism with great clinical potentials. However, in vivo quantitative mapping of APT using the conventional asymmetry analysis is difficult due to the confounding Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE) and the asymmetry of the magnetization transfer (MT) effect. Here we showed that the asymmetry of MT contrast from immobile macromolecules is highly significant, and the wide spectral separation associated with a high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

37
443
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(70 reference statements)
37
443
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the fat suppression was applied prior to acquisition, this MTR asym should not be dominated by the contamination of lipid at −3.5 ppm relative to water resonance, the opposite side on Z-spectrum [40]. Therefore, the contribution of possible upfield nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects to the MTR asym difference should be small [37, 38]. According to a 500 MHz proton NMR study of Cer and its analogs in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) at 25° C by Li et al [42], −NH in Cers has a chemical shift of ~6.3 ppm, about 1.6 ppm relative to water (4.7 ppm chemical shift).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the fat suppression was applied prior to acquisition, this MTR asym should not be dominated by the contamination of lipid at −3.5 ppm relative to water resonance, the opposite side on Z-spectrum [40]. Therefore, the contribution of possible upfield nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects to the MTR asym difference should be small [37, 38]. According to a 500 MHz proton NMR study of Cer and its analogs in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) at 25° C by Li et al [42], −NH in Cers has a chemical shift of ~6.3 ppm, about 1.6 ppm relative to water (4.7 ppm chemical shift).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 4, two z-spectra overlapped relatively well on the right. Therefore, the contribution of possible upfield nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects to the MTR asym difference should be small [42, 43]. According to a 500MHz proton NMR study of Cer and its analogues in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) at 25°C by Li et al [44], -NH in Cers has a chemical shift of ~6.3ppm, about 1.6ppm relative to water (4.7ppm chemical shift).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two distinct saturation transfer (ST) effects apparent in vivo are attributed to protons of mobile proteins: at 3.5 ppm the backbone amide signals with their base catalyzed proton transfer (APT) and at -3.5 ppm the nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) mediated aliphatic proton magnetization transfer (so called exchangerelayed NOE or relayed-NOE (rNOE) ST) (8,9). For these protein ST effects, several interesting correlations have been shown that might play a role in vivo and especially in pathologies: dependence on intracellular pH (5,(10)(11)(12)(13), protein concentration (8,13), or protein folding (14,15) and aggregation states (16). Already, the use for brain tumor detection (6,(17)(18)(19)(20), grading (21), and possible differentiation of tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis (22) has been shown to be feasible by proteinbased saturation transfer MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%