1988
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.150.2.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR imaging of portal venous thrombosis: correlation with CT and sonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duplex sonography has proved most effective in the evaluation of cavernous transformation of the portal vein and in the follow-up evaluation of patients with SMV and portal vein thrombosis [25,26]. Nevertheless, difficulties can occur, and sonography may fail to provide the correct diagnosis [27,30]. Lack of demonstrable flow does not always indicate thrombosis; therefore, other imaging modalities, particularly CT, should be performed for confirmation [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplex sonography has proved most effective in the evaluation of cavernous transformation of the portal vein and in the follow-up evaluation of patients with SMV and portal vein thrombosis [25,26]. Nevertheless, difficulties can occur, and sonography may fail to provide the correct diagnosis [27,30]. Lack of demonstrable flow does not always indicate thrombosis; therefore, other imaging modalities, particularly CT, should be performed for confirmation [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real-time sonography, CT, and angiography findings in SVT have been extensively described in the literature [3][4][5]. A few recent reports have focused attention on the value of duplex Doppler sonography [6][7][8] and MRI [9][10][11], which not only study vessel morphology and patency but also flow velocity and direction in addition to thrombus detection. In this study, duplex Doppler sonography was performed in three patients with portal vein thrombosis and cavernous transformation; the Doppler signal from the periportal collateral vascular channels showed hepatopetal lowvelocity flow with absent respiratory variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attenuation values decrease gradually to 33-42 HU from 3-5 weeks [12,13]. Zirinsky et al [11] reported that with MRI recent thrombi (less than 5 weeks old) appeared hyperintense relative to liver and muscle on both T1-and T2-weighted images and that thrombi more than 2 months old may lose their relative hyperintensity on Tl-weighted images. An attempt at estimating the age of thrombi can therefore be made and this has clinical importance as it is assumed that patients with recent thrombi are most likely to benefit from anticoagulant treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the qualitative data, MR imaging is indicated when Doppler studies are inadequate. Magnetic resonance imaging is especially interesting for the detection of portosystemic collaterals [59,60], for the diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis [61,62], and for the diagnosis and evaluation of hepatic venous obstruction. In this last condition, MR imaging is complementary to Doppler sonography and is particularly helpful for the morphologic changes of the liver parenchyma and for the assessment of portal vein and IVC patency [63].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%