2015
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR Classification System Based on Axial Images for Cervical Compressive Myelopathy

Abstract: The Ax-CCM system showed good interobserver agreement, and the type 2 pattern was correlated with poor preoperative neurologic status and less postoperative improvement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Most studies that described the significance of T2WI signal changes focused on sagittal imaging, but a classification system based on axial image characteristics was also described recently. 132 The authors defined the following 4 types of changes: Type 0, normal pattern; Type 1, diffuse pattern; Type 2, fuzzy focal pattern; and Type 3, discrete focal pattern. 132 However, this classification remains to be validated.…”
Section: Myelopathy-intramedullary Cord Signal Change Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Most studies that described the significance of T2WI signal changes focused on sagittal imaging, but a classification system based on axial image characteristics was also described recently. 132 The authors defined the following 4 types of changes: Type 0, normal pattern; Type 1, diffuse pattern; Type 2, fuzzy focal pattern; and Type 3, discrete focal pattern. 132 However, this classification remains to be validated.…”
Section: Myelopathy-intramedullary Cord Signal Change Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…132 The authors defined the following 4 types of changes: Type 0, normal pattern; Type 1, diffuse pattern; Type 2, fuzzy focal pattern; and Type 3, discrete focal pattern. 132 However, this classification remains to be validated.…”
Section: Myelopathy-intramedullary Cord Signal Change Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The %GM T2 signal hyperintensity on a single axial section at the most affected level of the injury center (referred to as "lesion center") provided the strongest correlation with clinical measures of motor impairment and recovery. The value of assessing the transverse extent of T2 abnormality on a single axial section at the injury center has been similarly demonstrated in the setting of acute traumatic SC injury and compressive myelopathy, 18,27 suggesting that the transverse extent of injury in the SC on MR imaging carries significant diagnostic and prognostic information in a variety of pathologies. This result is significant because it allows for a more focused, rapid evaluation of the MR imaging findings centered at the injury center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The linear parameters including transverse diameter (TD), central sagittal diameter (CSD) and sagittal diameter (SD) were measured, and the Central_Ratio, Compression_Ratio and 1/4-Lateral_Compression_Ratio were calculated. ( Figure. 2) The Ax-CCM classi cation system is de ned as follows [8]: type 0 = normal signal intensity of spinal cord without any intramedullary T2 hyperintensity, type 1 = diffuse pattern of intramedullary T2 hyperintensity occupying more than two-thirds of axial dimension of spinal cord with an obscure and faint border, type 2 = focal intermedullary T2 hyperintensity with an obscure and faint border, type 3 = focal intramedullary T2 hyperintensity with a well-de ned and distinct margin.…”
Section: Imaging Methods and Analysis Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] The size and pattern of intramedullary spinal cord signal intensity changes are also related to the severity of impairment in patients with CSM. [8] Dynamic X-ray is frequently used to evaluate cervical segmental instability among CSM patients and its results also correlate with the preoperative symptoms and surgical outcomes. [9,10] However, correlating imaging ndings with the clinical picture is complicated by the increasingly wide-range of measurements on radiographs including MRI and dynamic X-ray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%