1998
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A short signal void in the common bile duct is considered an artifact caused by the hepatic artery. b Corresponding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography several hepatic segments is characteristic of SC [17,22,23] and corresponds well with the histologically described pattern of periportal fibrosis with both destruction and proliferation of smaller bile ducts. The short signal void in the CBD seen in MRCP but not in ERCP was presumably artificial in the vicinity of the dilated hepatic artery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A short signal void in the common bile duct is considered an artifact caused by the hepatic artery. b Corresponding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography several hepatic segments is characteristic of SC [17,22,23] and corresponds well with the histologically described pattern of periportal fibrosis with both destruction and proliferation of smaller bile ducts. The short signal void in the CBD seen in MRCP but not in ERCP was presumably artificial in the vicinity of the dilated hepatic artery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Two reports suggest a good correlation between MRC and ERCP in the diagnosis of SC. 31,36 In a prospective case-control study involving 102 patients, Fulcher et al 9 compared the MR cholangiograms obtained in 34 patients with PSC to those of 68 age-matched control patients with various hepatobiliary diseases, 6 of whom had AIH. In the detection of intrahepatic PSC, the reported sensitivity and specificity of MRC were between 85% and 88% and between 92% and 97%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MRC is relatively superior to ERCP in demonstrating dilated ducts above an obstruction. The investigators have noted that in some cases MRC may be deficient in determination of length of strictures below an obstructed duct [48] . Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for CCA, using 37 ng/ml as the cut-off level for CA19-9 and 5 ng/ml for CEA.…”
Section: Imaging In Pscmentioning
confidence: 99%