2013
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR-Based PET Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
123
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the possible benefits, surprisingly little has been done in this particular area although interest appears to be increasing as combined PET/MRI machines make their way into clinical practice [2]. In contrast, great effort has been devoted to skull stripping, the process of segmenting brain from nonbrain tissue without further considering the composition of the non-brain tissue [3], as well as the subsequent segmentation of the brain into different types of soft tissue [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the possible benefits, surprisingly little has been done in this particular area although interest appears to be increasing as combined PET/MRI machines make their way into clinical practice [2]. In contrast, great effort has been devoted to skull stripping, the process of segmenting brain from nonbrain tissue without further considering the composition of the non-brain tissue [3], as well as the subsequent segmentation of the brain into different types of soft tissue [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first application is in combined PET/MR imaging-currently transitioning to reach its full clinical potential-where attenuation correction is necessary but CT acquisition would require an additional scan (Bezrukov, Mantlik, Schmidt, Schölkopf & Pichler 2013). The second application is in certain types of radiotherapy planning, where CT's limited soft tissue contrast stunts accurate tumor delineation whereas MR provides valuable guidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, resulting PET quantification is accurate for adult and pediatric patients. However, significant quantitative errors are observed in and around skeletal structures (e. g., bone metastases and bone marrow) as bone attenuation is routinely neglected [7,15,18]. Furthermore, typical segmentation artifacts can occur in MR-based attenuation correction that are mostly observed around metal implants causing MR susceptibility artifacts.…”
Section: Image Interpretation and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cients are not measured but usually derived based on tissue segmentation using T1-weighted sequences [15]. In general, resulting PET quantification is accurate for adult and pediatric patients.…”
Section: Image Interpretation and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation