2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR arthrography of the hip with and without leg traction: Assessing the diagnostic performance in detection of ligamentum teres lesions with arthroscopic correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial results of traction MR arthrography of the hip showed high accuracy in detecting chondrolabral lesions, lesions of the ligamentum teres, and intra-articular loose bodies. [132][133][134][135] In our experience, traction is not only helpful in detecting cartilage delamination but also in visualizing the whole extent of cartilage damage in older patients with mild radiographic joint degeneration. In these patients the referring surgeons request advanced imaging with traction to determine whether a joint-preserving surgery is still a reasonable treatment option based on the already present cartilage degeneration (►Fig.…”
Section: Mri Protocolmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Initial results of traction MR arthrography of the hip showed high accuracy in detecting chondrolabral lesions, lesions of the ligamentum teres, and intra-articular loose bodies. [132][133][134][135] In our experience, traction is not only helpful in detecting cartilage delamination but also in visualizing the whole extent of cartilage damage in older patients with mild radiographic joint degeneration. In these patients the referring surgeons request advanced imaging with traction to determine whether a joint-preserving surgery is still a reasonable treatment option based on the already present cartilage degeneration (►Fig.…”
Section: Mri Protocolmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…MRI has been shown to have lower sensitivity and specificity in detecting partial LT tears compared with magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) 21 . Based on arthroscopic correlation, Schmaranzer et al 22 found that MRA demonstrated 90% and 72% sensitivity with and without the use of hip traction. Cerezal et al 15 found a similar sensitivity (92%) with MRA and leg traction for complete LT tears, though the sensitivity of highgrade partial tears was only 66% in this study.…”
Section: Risk Factor Reference(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy exists in the usefulness of imaging for diagnosing LT pathology. [39][40][41] Magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) is thought to be more useful than conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 1,42 Studies have noted intact and partially LT tears can have similar imaging findings on MRA, making the diagnosis of partial LT tears difficult.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%