2019 23rd International Conference Electronics 2019
DOI: 10.1109/electronics.2019.8765692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MQTT Quality of Service versus Energy Consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When we enable retain flag, MQTT broker is ability to keep only newest message that publish by publisher. This message is received by subscriber after it reconnects to MQTT broker 9 . However, when using SIP-MBA platform, subcriber can receive all message that published by publisher.…”
Section: Broken Connection Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When we enable retain flag, MQTT broker is ability to keep only newest message that publish by publisher. This message is received by subscriber after it reconnects to MQTT broker 9 . However, when using SIP-MBA platform, subcriber can receive all message that published by publisher.…”
Section: Broken Connection Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the article [8], the ratio of packet loss and packet transmission rate of QoS-0 level is highest. However, according to the article [9], the energy consumption of the QoS-0 level is only about 50% of the QoS-2 level and the communication bandwidth of QoS-0 is also lower than that of QoS-2. The MQTT protocol runs on TCP [10] and each TCP connection can only make one request and one response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QoS-0 level has the fastest transmission rate but has the lowest reliability [13], the opposite is the QoS-2 level. According to the article [14] the energy consumption of the QoS-0 level is only about 50% of the QoS-2 level. The report also did not specify the level of MQTT QoS that the system uses.…”
Section: A Iot Architecture For Healthcarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, other proposals related to the scope of our research are described: an approach for power and energy usage for scientific calculation with and without General-Purpose Unit (GPU) acceleration on RPi devices can be found in [39]; energy and execution time of several wearable and mobile devices, including RPi Zero, are compared in [40] with a benchmark to discuss offloading techniques to use for increasing quality of service (QoS) in IoT applications; a preliminary analysis and modeling of energy consumption of evolutionary algorithms in different devices, including RPi, is introduced in [41]; an estimation of energy consumption in transferring data using an IoT protocol over different QoS levels is presented in [42]; a linear IoT model to deploy processes and data to devices and servers in IoT (considering a RPi as a fog node) reducing the total energy consumption of nodes is introduced in [43]; a study about the service distribution in multi-layer IoT architecture to minimize the total energy consumption is presented in [44]; the evolution of the energy consumption of several RPi models is compared to alternative platforms in [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%