IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2003.1208708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPLS over WDM network design with packet level QoS constraints based on ILP models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our literature search, we have only come across two papers [8,14] that discuss the issue of regenerator placement within the context of a large network design problem. In this paper we focus on the RLP as a stand alone problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our literature search, we have only come across two papers [8,14] that discuss the issue of regenerator placement within the context of a large network design problem. In this paper we focus on the RLP as a stand alone problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the computational complexity of the joint problem, most of the studies in the literature focus on the subproblems corresponding to one layer and omit those arising in the other layer [3][4][5][6], or make simplifying assumptions to relax some of the subproblems [7][8][9]. There are also studies proposing formulations and solution methods for the joint problem [2,10].…”
Section: Multi-layer Virtual Topology Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) is the nodal interface constraint. Constraint (7) ensures that each established lightpath is routed along a path and assigned a wavelength in the optical layer, and constraint (8) is the optical link capacity constraint.…”
Section: Milp Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is generally impossible to provide single hop connectivity between each pair of end nodes due to limited number of router interfaces, optical impairments and other scalability issues. Consequently, it is necessary to create multihop paths and have electronic switching over multiple lightpaths for traffic between some source and destination pairs [1], [9], [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, grooming for multihop traffic is typically left for routing policy at a higher layer such as IP or MPLS [6], [7]. Recently, some algorithms have been proposed for multihop optical networks by relaxing some constraints [2], [12], [13]. Also, some graph models have been proposed for multihop logical topology design and traffic grooming [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%