2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPIDepQBF: Towards Parallel QBF Solving without Knowledge Sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As future work it would be interesting to consider further variants of Qresolution systems [2] (apart from traditional [14] and long-distance resolution [1,26]) as a means of diversification in HordeQBF, which would amount to a combination of QBF proof systems with different power. Further, it may be promising to equip HordeQBF with search space partitioning as in MPIDepQBF [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As future work it would be interesting to consider further variants of Qresolution systems [2] (apart from traditional [14] and long-distance resolution [1,26]) as a means of diversification in HordeQBF, which would amount to a combination of QBF proof systems with different power. Further, it may be promising to equip HordeQBF with search space partitioning as in MPIDepQBF [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search space is partitioned like in the SAT solver PSATO based on guiding paths [25]. The MPI-based solver MPIDepQBF [13] implements a master/worker architecture without knowledge sharing. A worker consists of an instance of the QCDCL solver DepQBF [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the code of most of the early approaches is not available anymore. Following the success of Cube-and-Conquer-based searchspace splitting, the QBF solver MPIDepQBF has been presented [14]. While MPIDepQBF does not implement any sophisticated look-ahead mechanisms, it could demonstrate that even without knowledge-sharing considerable speedup could be achieved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, only variables from the outermost quantifier block Q 1 X may be considered, because otherwise, the value of the formula might change. Jordan et al [14] observed that for QBF following the sequential order of the variables in the first quantifier block already leads to improvements compared to the sequential implementation of DepQBF. The already existing QBF solver module of ParaCooba (see section 4) relied on this observation: it traverses the prefix of a PCNF and splits each visited leaf into two sub-trees, respecting both universal and existential quantifiers, until a pre-defined maximum depth is reached.…”
Section: Paracoobamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they used a set of quite easy benchmarks, which does not sufficiently show the usability of their approach on harder problems. Jordan et al use a search space splitting approach without any knowledge exchange, and report significant improvements on up to 64 threads [130].…”
Section: Parallel Constraint Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%