1988
DOI: 10.2307/939245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mozart's Codas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Morgan's observation on Beethoven (1993) is, therefore, very similar to Cavett‐Dunsby's on Mozart (1988). …”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Morgan's observation on Beethoven (1993) is, therefore, very similar to Cavett‐Dunsby's on Mozart (1988). …”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…After all, to theorise a section of the sonata structure that is so varied as the coda is no easy task, which is probably why Kerman ultimately believed that the term ‘coda’ referred simply to a position rather than a musical function. Esther Cavett‐Dunsby, who was among the first to respond to Kerman's comments, not only refuted his claim that ‘Mozart often works without a coda’ (Kerman 1982, p. 142) but also exposed the author's failure to define the term, so that one would be able ‘to identify a coda or its absence’ (Cavett‐Dunsby 1988, p. 32). She proposed two types of sonata‐form codas in Mozart: (1) formal codas, which begin after double bar lines and repeat signs, and (2) structural codas, which reinforce the harmonic closure after the completion of the fundamental line.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…199 In this vein, Schenker assigns structural-functional distinctions to specific prolongations, attempting to reconcile their synchronic role with the diachronic forces that impel them towards the closure of the Ursatz. Examples include initial ascents (Anstieg) to the primary tone (Kopfton) of the Urlinie, interruptions (Unterbrechung), and any prolongations situated in a movement's "structural" coda (i.e., the portion of the movement following the closure of the Ursatz (Cavett- Dunsby, 1988)). In the case of the interruption, while it can only occupy a certain diachronic position (i.e., after the first statement of 3/I and before the restatement of the Kopfton), it also serves a specific synchronic function, namely the form-generating role of sustaining the development section.…”
Section: Synchronic Structure As Functional Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%