2000
DOI: 10.2307/1389535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving up, but How Far? African American Women and Economic Restructuring in Los Angeles, 1970–1990

Abstract: In this article we use 1970 to 1990 Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) to examine patterns associated with African American women's economic and labor market integration in Los Angeles. We examine key indicators of overall economic restructuring in Los Angeles, such as patterns of industrial growth and decline during the period in question. Wefocus primarily onfour specific labor market characteristics: changes in industrial characteristics of Los Angeles, changing occupational distribution, changes in earnin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Income polarization is the result of occupational and income disparities between men and women, as well as among women and among men along the lines of "race," ethnicity, age and other social locations (Vosko 2000). Previous research has found growing income and occupational polarization among women by "race," ethnicity and immigrant status (Bakan and Stasiulus 1997;Das Gupta 1996;James, Grant and Cranford 2000;Vosko 2002). …”
Section: The Feminization Of Employment Normsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Income polarization is the result of occupational and income disparities between men and women, as well as among women and among men along the lines of "race," ethnicity, age and other social locations (Vosko 2000). Previous research has found growing income and occupational polarization among women by "race," ethnicity and immigrant status (Bakan and Stasiulus 1997;Das Gupta 1996;James, Grant and Cranford 2000;Vosko 2002). …”
Section: The Feminization Of Employment Normsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, different regulatory challenges are posed by own account self-employment, the triangular employment relationship characterizing wage work in the temporary help industry and part-time permanent wage work Fudge, Tucker and Vosko 2003;Mayer 1996;Vosko 2000). With economic restructuring, there is also growing income polarization among full-time permanent paid employees (James, Grant and Cranford 2000;Luxton and Corman 2001). Finally, there are inequalities along lines of gender, "race" and ethnicity within both standard and non-standard forms of employment (Das Gupta 1996;Zeytinoglu and Muteshi 1999).…”
Section: The Gender Of Precarious Employment In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occupation-specific examples and current manifestation of this are live-in domestic workers and personal caregivers who are recruited from abroad (Arat-Koc 1997; Zaman 2012) as well as seasonal agricultural workers (Tucker 2005). Furthermore, "because of enduring racism and nativism, women of color, and immigrant women are particularly disadvantaged by shifts to a polarized service sector and downgrading of manufacturing" (Vosko 2005, p. 46;Glenn 1992;Gabriel 1999;James, Grant, and Cranford 2000;Das Gupta 2002).…”
Section: The Formation Of Market Migrants and The Context Of Marginalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%