Moving towards a circular economy: economic impacts of higher material recycling targets

Abstract

The circular economy requires well-functioning waste management systems. In this regards, packaging waste management (PWM) plays a key role. The Italian PWM system bases on a consortium with operate in compliance with the extended producer responsibility. The key financial mechanism ruling the functioning of the system is the so-called environment contribution. This paper draws up potential socioeconomic implications arising from higher recycling targets in the medium-term. Two scenarios are discussed: the baseline, which simulates the environmental contribution according to the current recycling rate along with the reference that reflects higher goals. Results suggest that higher recycling targets are associated with positive effects on job creation, production and value added by virtue of both direct and indirect effects. The application of the model has demonstrated significant positive socioeconomic impacts achievable when defining new policies and regulations for the sector. Although limited to Italy, this paper serves as a reference for policy makers since environmental legislation and especially waste management policy deserve careful consideration in the light of the polluter pays principle and shared responsibility.

Environmental policies for drinks packaging in Georgia: A mini-review of EPR policies with a focus on incentive compatibility

“…There are, for example, proposals to subsidize the recycling sector in China (Zhang and Wen, 2014). Moreover, Beccarello and Di Foggia refer to the ‘positive effects on job creation’ of higher recycling targets (2018: 538), which might be taken as a justification to extend recycling activities and neglect the waste hierarchy.…”

Towards a Circular Economy: A Case Study of Waste Conversion into Housing Units in Cotonou, Benin

“…In such cases, it becomes possible to provide incentives to reduce waste generation, as well as to introduce 'green' taxes focusing on ensuring reduction and proper disposal of waste. Through those taxes, and application of a 'polluter pays' initiative [22], local governments are able create new revenue streams as well as to encourage waste reduction and the application of the 3Rs-reduce, reuse, and recycle [11]. In addition, besides those measures, various cities are utilising waste as a source of energy.…”

“…Efforts to address waste has led to an increasing body of literature investigating waste management and waste conversion [5,31]. Even though it is known that waste leads to environmental degradation and increased health problems [6], it has been shown to also create revenue for local residents [29,30], create employment [29,32], and help solve building and construction challenges while providing an alternative revenue stream for local government [22], amongst others.…”

“…However, there is research that points to the benefit of adopting a circular economy to welcome a more robust economic model and to better include the society at numerous levels [22,86,87]. Beccarello and Foggia [22] argue that adopting a circular economy allows for the inclusion of the society. Adoption results in the possibility of introducing strategies aimed at helping the reduction of waste and, at the same time, promoting the re-use and recycling of waste materials.…”

Improving efficiency in the MSW collection and disposal service combining price cap and yardstick regulation: The Italian case

“…Every local government provides a MSW collection and disposal service to its residents and although service levels, costs and the environmental impact vary deeply, it is arguably one of the most important municipal service (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012). The MSW collection and disposal service has established itself as a pillar in the strategy for a more circular economy worldwide (Beccarello and Di Foggia, 2018). It thus follows from this that both the optimal territorial areas (OTAs) i.e.…”