2022
DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving the field forward: detection of epileptiform abnormalities on scalp electroencephalography using deep learning—clinical application perspectives

Abstract: The application of deep learning approaches for the detection of inter-ictal epileptiform discharges is a nascent field, with most studies published in the past 5 years. Although many recent models have been published demonstrating promising results, deficiencies in descriptions of datasets, unstandardized methods, variation in performance evaluation and lack of demonstrable generalizability have made it difficult for these algorithms to be compared and progress to clinical validity. A few recent publications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, AI approaches in clinical EEG have addressed only limited aspects in isolation, such as distinguishing normal from abnormal recordings, detecting seizures, or detecting interictal epileptiform discharges . Other publications have also claimed that AI achieved human expert performance for spike detectors but not for the comprehensive assessment of routine clinical EEGs, equivalent to human expert assessment, which has not yet been reported. Most previously published approaches bear important limitations that are often encountered in AI studies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, AI approaches in clinical EEG have addressed only limited aspects in isolation, such as distinguishing normal from abnormal recordings, detecting seizures, or detecting interictal epileptiform discharges . Other publications have also claimed that AI achieved human expert performance for spike detectors but not for the comprehensive assessment of routine clinical EEGs, equivalent to human expert assessment, which has not yet been reported. Most previously published approaches bear important limitations that are often encountered in AI studies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%