2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving resources across permeable project boundaries in open network contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interfaces in R&D projects are relevant in the connection with actors involved in financing, with suppliers, with users/adopters and with project institutional actors (Waluszewski et al, 2009). Therefore, the analysis of the role of ERDPs in SMEs' resource development provides a contribution to the IMP literature on R&D and innovation processes within project and project networks (Baraldi and Ingemansson, 2013;Cantù et al, 2012;Lind et al, 2012). In the light of the explorative nature of this research, this paper adopts a qualitative methodology based on a longitudinal case study (Yin, 2003;Halinen and Törnroos, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interfaces in R&D projects are relevant in the connection with actors involved in financing, with suppliers, with users/adopters and with project institutional actors (Waluszewski et al, 2009). Therefore, the analysis of the role of ERDPs in SMEs' resource development provides a contribution to the IMP literature on R&D and innovation processes within project and project networks (Baraldi and Ingemansson, 2013;Cantù et al, 2012;Lind et al, 2012). In the light of the explorative nature of this research, this paper adopts a qualitative methodology based on a longitudinal case study (Yin, 2003;Halinen and Törnroos, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, numerous other concepts in the literature on team learning, collective cognition and group information processing have addressed the flow of knowledge and information in quite comprehensive ways, with theory developed to explain these processes and provide evidence for the relationships proposed (e.g. Edmondson, 2002; Gibson, 2001; Gibson and Earley, 2007; Gibson and Vermeulen, 2003; Hargadon and Bechky, 2006; Hinsz et al, 1997; Kostopoulos et al, 2013; Lind et al, 2012). For example, Lind et al (2012) discussed porous boundaries in the context of open innovation, showing the importance of the flow of ideas, knowledge, technologies and innovation across it.…”
Section: Refinement Of the Boundary Permeability Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edmondson, 2002; Gibson, 2001; Gibson and Earley, 2007; Gibson and Vermeulen, 2003; Hargadon and Bechky, 2006; Hinsz et al, 1997; Kostopoulos et al, 2013; Lind et al, 2012). For example, Lind et al (2012) discussed porous boundaries in the context of open innovation, showing the importance of the flow of ideas, knowledge, technologies and innovation across it. Gibson and colleagues (Gibson, 2001; Gibson and Earley, 2007) developed theory regarding how teams acquire knowledge, integrate it and use it for decision-making or action.…”
Section: Refinement Of the Boundary Permeability Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid a potentially misleading dichotomy, researchers increasingly use the term permeable as measure to quantify and qualify the openness of corporate boundaries (e.g. Baldwin and von Hippel 2011, Bianchi et al 2011, Cooke 2005, Grönlund et al 2010, Lind et al 2012.…”
Section: Openness As a Means To Product Innovation And Renewalmentioning
confidence: 99%