2015
DOI: 10.1017/s002205071500008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Matters: The Effect of Location on Crop Production

Abstract: U.S corn output increased from 1.8 billion bushels in 1879 to 12.7 billion bushels in 2007. Concurrently, the footprint of production changed substantially. Failure to take proper account of movements means that productivity assessments likely misattribute sources of growth and climate change studies likely overestimate impacts. Our new spatial output indexes show that 16 to 21 percent of the increase in U.S. corn output over the 128 years beginning in 1879 was attributable to spatial movement in production. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association has a particularly vital implication given the relatively large marginal effects estimated for this region. These results are also in line with the historical movements of corn location discussed [26,27]. Average precipitation (March, April, May, June) are found to be negatively related to corn yields because preplanting time and during planting time precipitation adversely effects crop yield.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This association has a particularly vital implication given the relatively large marginal effects estimated for this region. These results are also in line with the historical movements of corn location discussed [26,27]. Average precipitation (March, April, May, June) are found to be negatively related to corn yields because preplanting time and during planting time precipitation adversely effects crop yield.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…national or supra-national regions). General shifts of cropping areas towards higher productive areas are very likely (Beddow and Pardey, 2015) as can be investigated by land use models, which project changes in land use and production as socio-economic responses to changes in agricultural productivity. Future land use uncertainty can also be addressed by aggregating simulated changes in productivity with external land use scenarios as in Pugh et al (2015) and remain a challenge for further crop modeling studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CELL5M has been utilized to define and characterize study areas ( e.g ., van Wart et al , 2013); estimate market travel times ( e.g. , Damania et al , 2016); explore geography changes in crop production ( e.g ., Beddow & Pardey, 2015); calculate local agricultural commodity prices ( e.g. , Fjelde, 2015); map the threat of potential plant diseases ( e.g ., Kriticos et al , 2015); model climate change adaptations in agriculture ( e.g ., Robinson et al , 2015); and as a general data framework ( e.g.…”
Section: Cell5m Use-casesmentioning
confidence: 99%