2022
DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2111663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving in the presence of others – a systematic review and meta-analysis on social facilitation

Abstract: 00019-X) found the presence of others to positively affect condition-based tasks (general drive hypothesis,

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the game's nature and the data we collected, we defined both behavioral interdependence and team collaboration as the team dynamics regarding the physical distances between team members and their tendency to cluster together. This is consistent with previous behavioral research where physical proximity plays a key role in team members propensity to collaborate 68 , 69 . In general, existing evidence shows that team members who are physically close to each other are more prone to collaborate compared to those members with low physical proximity.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Considering the game's nature and the data we collected, we defined both behavioral interdependence and team collaboration as the team dynamics regarding the physical distances between team members and their tendency to cluster together. This is consistent with previous behavioral research where physical proximity plays a key role in team members propensity to collaborate 68 , 69 . In general, existing evidence shows that team members who are physically close to each other are more prone to collaborate compared to those members with low physical proximity.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The absolute difference in 3DA however is negligibly small, with only half a point increase with a real audience and decrease with a simulated audience, which is irrelevant in the context of darts. Small effect sizes are in line with many studies on audience effects in other sports 5,28 . The hierarchical linear model for 3DA could explain more than 40% of the total variance in 3DA and ICC=12%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, the presence of an audience tends to increase performances in motor tasks that place demands on the condition of performers, but seems to decrease some performances that require precise object manipulation 26,27 . These findings were recently confirmed in a systematic review and meta-analysis 28 . Several different theories have been developed to explain the results either based on the drive/activation level of the performer 23,24,29,30 , or based on the attentional conflict that arises when others are present [31][32][33] .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The absolute difference in 3DA, however, is negligibly small, with only half a point decrease with a real audience and increase with a simulated audience, which is practically irrelevant for winning in darts. Small effect sizes are in line with many studies on audience effects in other sports 5,32 . The hierarchical linear model for 3DA could explain more than 40% of the total variance in 3DA with an ICC of 12%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, the presence of an audience tends to increase performances in motor tasks that place demands on the condition of performers, but seems to decrease some performances that require precise object manipulation 30,31 . These findings were recently confirmed in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 100 years of research on social facilitation during motor tasks 32 . Several different theories have been developed to explain the results either based on the drive/activation level of the performer 27,28,33,34 , or based on the attentional conflict that arises when others are present [35][36][37] .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 69%