53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2014.7039785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving-horizon estimation for discrete-time linear systems with measurements subject to outliers

Abstract: Moving-horizon state estimation is addressed for discrete-time linear systems with disturbances acting on the dynamic and measurement equations. In particular, the measurement noises can take abnormal values, usually called outliers. For such systems, one can adopt a Kalman filter with estimate update that depends on the result of a statistical test on the residuals. As an alternative to such a method, we propose a robust moving-horizon estimator. Such a method provides estimates of the state variables obtaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with ξ = 0.2, ω = 0.5 rad/s, and sampling period T = 0.5 s. The initial states were generated as white Gaussian noises with mean [1 1] and covariance P 0 = diag (2,2). White Gaussian processes with means equal to zero and covariances Q = diag(1, 1), and r = 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 (except in case of outlier) were chosen as system and measurement disturbances, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…with ξ = 0.2, ω = 0.5 rad/s, and sampling period T = 0.5 s. The initial states were generated as white Gaussian noises with mean [1 1] and covariance P 0 = diag (2,2). White Gaussian processes with means equal to zero and covariances Q = diag(1, 1), and r = 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 (except in case of outlier) were chosen as system and measurement disturbances, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one may check abnormal residuals via a threshold test to skip the Kalman estimate update with such residuals. This procedure can be motivated from a theoretical point of view by using the maximum likelihood criterion [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the comparison are added to a single value of a synthetic outlier, then the position estimation is performed, and the measurements of pseudo range are obtained. Using the same concept, the outlier identification algorithm and the MHE are used in parallel as in [23], [24], and some other additional measures can be clubbed with the same. The output results obtained from the simulation are exclusively designed for the positioning estimation of the measurements subjected to outliers and free noise of GPS positioning having the original code [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier model-based MHE proofs that were specifically developed for linear systems have mostly been done under the assumption that no disturbances are present[17] or result in similar estimation error bounds that get worse with increasing horizon L[18], similar to[15],[16] 3. With slight abuse of notation, we denote by x(x, u) and h(x) the state and corresponding output sequence starting at initial condition x and generated by the input sequence u.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%