2020
DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving from Critical Assessment to Assessment as Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While multiple-choice testing does not necessarily run counter to teaching intersectionality, it reinforces a teaching practice that determines if students meet grading criteria arbitrarily established by the module's designers. Relying on solely the student success rate from the assessment can lead to assumptions about whether students' learning is satisfactory or deficient (Arellano Douglas, 2020). This either/or, positivist grading framework can be limiting in examining the student's full individual experience with the module.…”
Section: Learner Engagement With Intersectional Research Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While multiple-choice testing does not necessarily run counter to teaching intersectionality, it reinforces a teaching practice that determines if students meet grading criteria arbitrarily established by the module's designers. Relying on solely the student success rate from the assessment can lead to assumptions about whether students' learning is satisfactory or deficient (Arellano Douglas, 2020). This either/or, positivist grading framework can be limiting in examining the student's full individual experience with the module.…”
Section: Learner Engagement With Intersectional Research Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning lessons from library services and resources that serve virtual students is also valuable, such as evaluating chat and library electronic resources (Dempsey, 2019;Devine et al, 2011;Eastman et al, 2019;Ireland & Woods, 2008;Leong, 2007;Logan et al, 2019;Maloney & Kemp, 2015;Rogers & Nielsen, 2017;Valentine & Moss, 2017). Library assessment that helps online students is not always in the form of an analysis on this population; recent studies on critical assessment and creating inclusive instruction and virtual spaces also help librarians better serve all underrepresented patron groups (Catalano, 2014;Douglas, 2020;Heinbach et al, 2019;Roth & Turnbow, 2021;Tewell, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In separating two aspects of knowledge creation, the thinking and sensing activities of the educational process are categorized independently, allowing value to be ascribed to one over the other. This approach is common within Library and Information Science (LIS), where learning analytics are widely used to demonstrate impact, while the value of relationship-building and connection is often relegated to the margins (Arellano Douglas, 2020). A process of learning and unlearning, however, is not a dualistic process; in gathering additional knowledge (thinking) and reconciling it with our past notions of knowing (sensing/feeling), a dialectical third space opens within the learning journey (Rendón, 2008; Anzaldúa, 2002).…”
Section: Conocimiento As Knowledge Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%