2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving from a Mechanical Microkeratome to a Femtosecond Laser for LASIK to Correct Astigmatic Patients: Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective, Consecutive, Comparative Study

Abstract: This study shows that the method of flap creation has a significant impact on postoperative astigmatism with a significantly better postoperative UDVA in the Femto group. These findings suggest that the femtosecond laser provides a better platform for LASIK treatment of astigmatism than the commonly used microkeratome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly the quest for intrastromal lenticules was pursued since the inception of femtosecond lasers [24]. The first company to develop a commercial instrument realizing corneal flaps was Intralase, with which more predictable flap thickness [25,26] and dimensions [27], better astigmatic neutrality [28], and decreased epithelial injury was demonstrated compared to two popular mechanical microkeratomes [29]. However, some specific femtoLASIK complications have been also discovered [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly the quest for intrastromal lenticules was pursued since the inception of femtosecond lasers [24]. The first company to develop a commercial instrument realizing corneal flaps was Intralase, with which more predictable flap thickness [25,26] and dimensions [27], better astigmatic neutrality [28], and decreased epithelial injury was demonstrated compared to two popular mechanical microkeratomes [29]. However, some specific femtoLASIK complications have been also discovered [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microkeratome technology still represents a reliable method for customized LASIK procedures. 6 , 27 , 29 , 30 Nevertheless, the LDV femtosecond laser provides superior results by more closely creating the desired flap thickness, thus accelerating the visual recovery in comparison to microkeratome. 7 , 24 , 29 , 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femtosecond laser not only produce an individualized flap but also have been associated with improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), more stable biomechanics, and decreased epithelial injury postoperatively. [ 7 8 9 10 ] However, despite high success rates of FS-LASIK, side effects such as dryness, glare, haloes, and flap-related complications remain a significant concern. [ 11 12 ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%