2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving forward with zoo welfare assessment: A response to Cooke (2017)

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication 1 Moving forward with zoo welfare assessment; a response to Cooke (2017).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different species might have different motivators while individuals might have different triggers at different times or in different scenarios (Bauer et al, 2013). The logical starting point for any type of species, including the giant anteater, is to determine the individual's pacing motivation through the lens of risk factors determined by its natural history (Rose et al, 2017a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different species might have different motivators while individuals might have different triggers at different times or in different scenarios (Bauer et al, 2013). The logical starting point for any type of species, including the giant anteater, is to determine the individual's pacing motivation through the lens of risk factors determined by its natural history (Rose et al, 2017a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All taxa may benefit from an enriched captive environment that allows performance of behavioural diversity and that promotes positive affective states (Rose et al 2017a(Rose et al , 2017b(Rose et al , 2019a. As some taxonomic groups are particularly susceptible to the development of abnormal repetitive behaviour when housed in captivity, EE has often been implemented as a preventative or treatment strategy (Shyne 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inference of welfare state in reptiles, amphibians, fish or invertebrates appears more challenging than for endotherms. This challenge may be because outward visible signs of welfare state are often subtle and environmental variables (such as temperature) strongly influence activity levels and behaviour (Burghardt 2013;Bashaw et al 2016;Rose et al 2017Rose et al , 2017b. If key welfare indicators are unknown or hard to identify, the difficulties for researchers in their attempts to identify effective EE strategies are increased (Greenway et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%