2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-020-09392-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving educational policy to educators’ lived reality: One state’s trickle-down, bottom-up pathway to literacy intervention reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conceptual framework is guided by the understanding that “policies are enacted within social, cultural, political, and financial parameters that influence the interpretation and the implementation of the policy into schools and the classroom” (Barrett‐Tatum & Ashworth, 2021, p. 358) and that each level involves both envisioning and enactment of policy (Schulte, 2018). We posit that the policy framework that guides teachers' everyday decisions around curriculum and instruction of ELs is hierarchal yet multidirectional (see Figure 1), which often results in multiple interpretations and subsequent implementations by teachers.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our conceptual framework is guided by the understanding that “policies are enacted within social, cultural, political, and financial parameters that influence the interpretation and the implementation of the policy into schools and the classroom” (Barrett‐Tatum & Ashworth, 2021, p. 358) and that each level involves both envisioning and enactment of policy (Schulte, 2018). We posit that the policy framework that guides teachers' everyday decisions around curriculum and instruction of ELs is hierarchal yet multidirectional (see Figure 1), which often results in multiple interpretations and subsequent implementations by teachers.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, while district initiatives responding to accountability policies including changes to curriculum, instruction, and teacher beliefs have at times been successful (Spillane et al, 2018; Woulfin, 2015), researchers have also found evidence that central office administrators, principals, and/or teachers may rush implementation of new district initiatives in ways that have unintended and, at times, negative consequences (Anagnostopoulos & Rutledge, 2007; Au, 2007). Ultimately, we know too little about how the high-stakes policy environment filters through the level of the district office to couple with the day-to-day practices by teachers in classrooms (Barrett-Tatum & Ashworth, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%