2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond the monosyllable in models of skilled reading: Mega-study of disyllabic nonword reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
115
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the number of character-level factors increases as word length increases, we averaged the character-level factors at different character positions and entered the averaged values in our regression models. A similar averaging procedure has been adopted in a megastudy that investigated how spelling-to-sound consistency of onsets and rimes affected nonword naming in English, such that the consistencies of onsets and rimes were averaged (Mousikou, Sadat, Lucas, & Rastle, 2017). The character-level factors included the number of words formed, cumulative character frequency, number of meanings, number of strokes, and number of pronunciations.…”
Section: Item-based Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the number of character-level factors increases as word length increases, we averaged the character-level factors at different character positions and entered the averaged values in our regression models. A similar averaging procedure has been adopted in a megastudy that investigated how spelling-to-sound consistency of onsets and rimes affected nonword naming in English, such that the consistencies of onsets and rimes were averaged (Mousikou, Sadat, Lucas, & Rastle, 2017). The character-level factors included the number of words formed, cumulative character frequency, number of meanings, number of strokes, and number of pronunciations.…”
Section: Item-based Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be that participants individually have very precise knowledge, perhaps expressed in the form of rules (e.g., Coltheart et al, 2001), but that this knowledge differs across participants as a result of differences in reading experience. Mousikou et al (2017) considered and rejected this possibility, on the basis that there is also a high degree of inconsistency within participants in the pronunciations and stress given to highly inconsistent orthographic units (see also Ktori, Mousikou, & Rastle, 2018). Overall, the findings of Mousikou et al (2017) suggest that even in a sample of highly skilled adult readers with considerable experience of English writing, there is a high degree of uncertainty in areas of the spelling-sound mapping.…”
Section: Spelling-sound Knowledge and Its Limits In English Skilled Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its limitations, this approach enables us to tease apart the effects of different variables and use them to evaluate models (e.g. see comparative evaluation of models in simulating stress assignment in Mousikou, Sadat, Lucas, & Rastle, 2017).…”
Section: Evaluating the Theoretical Assumptions Of Drcmentioning
confidence: 99%