2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-022-09673-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Beyond the Ableist Roots of Educational Psychology: Audit of the Field and a Path Forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For special education researchers, working with experts in motivation theories based in a social cognitive approach might result in students having enhanced experiences that could make vocabulary interventions even more successful, and their results even longer lasting. Educational psychologists could find that their motivation TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS/APRIL-JUNE 2023 theories would benefit from increased consideration of SWDs, given that this population has not been fully represented in their work (Emery et al, 2022). K-12 school-based educators who use these strategies with their students could then report back to a wider range of researchers about how classroom realities shape the practicality of applying study findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For special education researchers, working with experts in motivation theories based in a social cognitive approach might result in students having enhanced experiences that could make vocabulary interventions even more successful, and their results even longer lasting. Educational psychologists could find that their motivation TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS/APRIL-JUNE 2023 theories would benefit from increased consideration of SWDs, given that this population has not been fully represented in their work (Emery et al, 2022). K-12 school-based educators who use these strategies with their students could then report back to a wider range of researchers about how classroom realities shape the practicality of applying study findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%