2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
985
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,234 publications
(995 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
985
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Density plots of model risk scores and all other plots were created using the ggplot2 package 32 . Cumming estimation plots and calculations were produced using the dabestr package 33 and 1000 bootstrap resamples were used to visualize robust effect size estimates of model predictions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density plots of model risk scores and all other plots were created using the ggplot2 package 32 . Cumming estimation plots and calculations were produced using the dabestr package 33 and 1000 bootstrap resamples were used to visualize robust effect size estimates of model predictions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak stress was defined as the 95th percentile of the stress data to avoid extreme outliers that may be sensitive to boundary conditions. Effects sizes (in the mean and peak values) between models were estimated by calculating bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (25). We also analysed deep tissue stress along a path through the soft tissue directly beneath the ischial tuberosity, and along the surface of the ischial tuberosity.…”
Section: Solution Approach and Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data is plotted on the upper axes (summary measurements are displayed as gapped lines to the right of each plot: means are indicated as a gap in the lines, vertical lines represent standard deviation error bars); each mean difference is plotted on the lower axes as a bootstrap sampling distribution. Mean differences are depicted as dots; 95% confidence intervals are indicated by the ends of the vertical error bars 49 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%