2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Beyond "Does Active Learning Work?" with the Engineering Learning Observation Protocol (ELCOT)

Abstract: where her role focused on supporting instructors in conducting research about student outcomes in their courses. Megan's disciplinary background is in educational psychology. She earned her PhD from the Ohio State University, and her research focused on the idea of relevance in higher education-how we define it, how students perceive it, and how to measure it-an interest that continues to inform her work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cohort sections performed higher than non-cohort sections on all questions of common exams in Chemistry, with smaller but notable increases on lower cognitively demanding questions. As we report in other papers [18], [21], overall (aggregate) and in individual classes we see significant enhancements to student outcomes. The enhanced outcomes include academic performance regarding assessment of content knowledge, an enhancement in professional skills (e.g., discourse, reasoning, argumentation), and student perceptions of the classes.…”
Section: Students Perform Bettersupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Cohort sections performed higher than non-cohort sections on all questions of common exams in Chemistry, with smaller but notable increases on lower cognitively demanding questions. As we report in other papers [18], [21], overall (aggregate) and in individual classes we see significant enhancements to student outcomes. The enhanced outcomes include academic performance regarding assessment of content knowledge, an enhancement in professional skills (e.g., discourse, reasoning, argumentation), and student perceptions of the classes.…”
Section: Students Perform Bettersupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A critical friend also observed one of my classes and provided a written observation (my critical friend was a fellow teacher at the same university who I asked to observe one class and provide critical feedback). For the observations, we filled out an analytical observation chart (adapted from Burns, 2010) and a classroom observation protocol, which was an adaption of three observation protocolsthe Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching observation scheme (Spada & Frohlich, 1995), the Motivation Orientation of Language Teaching observation scheme (Guilloteaux & Dörnyei, 2008), and the Engineering Learning Classroom Observation Tool (Sanders et al, 2017(Sanders et al, , 2018. These were adapted since they each contained elements relevant to an implementation of active learning in an English-language course.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also developed tools to help assess the up-take and impact of the model. For instance, we created the Engineering Learning Observation Tool (ELCOT) (Tolnay, Spiegel, & Sherer, 2016;Sanders, Spiegel, & Sherer, 2018) to monitor shifts in classroom interactions and the alignment with the learning outcomes and course design. We are beginning to see the impact of our faculty development efforts on faculty knowledge, instructional skills, beliefs about teaching and learning, practices, and ultimately, student outcomes.…”
Section: Engineering Learning In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%