2009
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond a legal‐centric approach to managing workplace romances: organizationally sensible recommendations for HR leaders

Abstract: The goal of this article is to encourage human resource (HR) leaders to think more strategically about managing workplace romances. The traditional legal-centric management approach focuses on minimizing risks of workplace romances. We advocate embedding the legal-centric approach within a broader and more strategic organizationally sensible approach that provides a balanced focus on minimizing risks and maximizing rewards of workplace romances. Drawing from the empirical workplace romance literature, we deriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite organizations' fears, relatively few harassment lawsuits stem from workplace romances (Pierce et al, 2008). Consequently, researchers have recommended that HR leaders should shift their focus from using a legal-centric approach to an organizationally sensible approach for managing workplace romances (Pierce and Aguinis, 2009). An organizationally sensible approach would not focus on the potential for harassment claims at the expense of other work criteria (e.g., employees' job performance (Roehling and Wright, 2006)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite organizations' fears, relatively few harassment lawsuits stem from workplace romances (Pierce et al, 2008). Consequently, researchers have recommended that HR leaders should shift their focus from using a legal-centric approach to an organizationally sensible approach for managing workplace romances (Pierce and Aguinis, 2009). An organizationally sensible approach would not focus on the potential for harassment claims at the expense of other work criteria (e.g., employees' job performance (Roehling and Wright, 2006)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some think that workplace romances are a private matter and should not be managed via organizational policies and procedures (Lickey et al, 2009). Given that workplace romances may be considered a private matter, are part of organizational life, and can be beneficial (Pierce and Aguinis, 2009), we predict that individuals will perceive an organization's romance policy and relationship agreement as fair if they contain lenient as opposed to restrictive stipulations. An example of a lenient policy is one that allows romances between peers but prohibits romances between supervisors and their subordinates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other policies focus on hierarchical relationships in which power differences exist. Many policies focus on avoiding workplace gossip and rumors (Cowan & Horan, 2014;Paul & Townsend, 1998;Pierce & Aguinis, 2009) and discourage fraternization among employees (Shaefer & Tudor, 2001). Despite such policies, some organizations avoid interfering in workplace romances out of concern about possibly violating human rights (Wilson, 2015).…”
Section: Organization Policy and Workplace Romancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most empirical studies on workplace romance (e.g., Anderson & Fisher, 1991;Brown & Allgeier, 1996;Horan & Chory, 2011;Mainiero, 1986;Powell, 2001;Quinn, 1977) have relied mainly on data from co-workers' observations and self-report surveys (Wilson, 2015), which can provide useful knowledge on organization morale and equitable employee treatment (Cowan & Horan, 2014;Liberman & Okimoto, 2008;Pierce & Aguinis, 2009). However, it is also important to conduct interviews and discussions with people who have experienced workplace romance to supplement the largely third-person perspective of previous research with first-person perceptions.…”
Section: Summary and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concepts of CSR have evolved over time, and CSR has two definitions from two points of view. The socio-philanthropic perspective defines CSR as actions and charitable programs restraining profit maximization, and the legal standpoint of complying with regulations and rules defines CSR as charitable actions beyond the minimum legal parameters (Andrews, 1973;Buehler & Shetty, 1976;Hollender, 2004;Pierce & Aguinis, 2009;D'Aprile & Talò, 2014). Donation is defined as charitable gifts or actions without any business purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%