2012
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1391178547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving averages in the plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next result specifies the announced Theorem 1. It is mainly a consequence of the preceding proposition and some standard techniques as developed in Moonens and Rosenblatt [6]. Theorem 6.…”
Section: Maximal Operators Associated To Lacunary Sequences Of Direct...mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The next result specifies the announced Theorem 1. It is mainly a consequence of the preceding proposition and some standard techniques as developed in Moonens and Rosenblatt [6]. Theorem 6.…”
Section: Maximal Operators Associated To Lacunary Sequences Of Direct...mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Using the previous proposition, we can, using standard techniques developed e.g. in a previous work by the second and third authors [12] or in a paper by the current authors [3], obtain negative differentiation results in a range of Orlicz spaces for some differentiation bases of rectangles associated to various sets θ.…”
Section: Some Geometrical Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Following Stokolos [11] (and using the terminology introduced in Moonens and Rosenblatt [9]), we say that a family of standard dyadic rectangles in R n has finite width in case it is a finite union of families of rectangles totally ordered by inclusion, and that it has infinite width otherwise. Il follows from a general result by Dilworth [4] that a family of rectangles in R n has infinite width if and only if it contains families of incomparable (with respect to inclusion) rectangles having arbitrary large (finite) cardinality.…”
Section: Comparability Conditions On Rectanglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove Theorem 7, it is sufficient, according to Proposition 3, to prove the following lemma, improving on Stokolos techniques in [11] and [13], and using Rademacher functions as in [9]. Lemma 10.…”
Section: Another Series Of Examples After Stokolosmentioning
confidence: 99%