“…The next result specifies the announced Theorem 1. It is mainly a consequence of the preceding proposition and some standard techniques as developed in Moonens and Rosenblatt [6]. Theorem 6.…”
Section: Maximal Operators Associated To Lacunary Sequences Of Direct...mentioning
We show that, given some lacunary sequence of angles θ = (θj) j∈N not converging too fast to zero, it is possible to build a rare differentiation basis B of rectangles parallel to the axes that differentiates L 1 (R 2 ) while the basis B θ obtained from B by allowing its elements to rotate around their lower left vertex by the angles θj, j ∈ N, fails to differentiate all Orlicz spaces lying between L 1 (R 2 ) and L log L(R 2 ).
“…The next result specifies the announced Theorem 1. It is mainly a consequence of the preceding proposition and some standard techniques as developed in Moonens and Rosenblatt [6]. Theorem 6.…”
Section: Maximal Operators Associated To Lacunary Sequences Of Direct...mentioning
We show that, given some lacunary sequence of angles θ = (θj) j∈N not converging too fast to zero, it is possible to build a rare differentiation basis B of rectangles parallel to the axes that differentiates L 1 (R 2 ) while the basis B θ obtained from B by allowing its elements to rotate around their lower left vertex by the angles θj, j ∈ N, fails to differentiate all Orlicz spaces lying between L 1 (R 2 ) and L log L(R 2 ).
“…Using the previous proposition, we can, using standard techniques developed e.g. in a previous work by the second and third authors [12] or in a paper by the current authors [3], obtain negative differentiation results in a range of Orlicz spaces for some differentiation bases of rectangles associated to various sets θ.…”
In the current paper, we study how the speed of convergence of a sequence of angles decreasing to zero influences the possibility of constructing a rare differentiation basis of rectangles in the plane, one side of which makes with the horizontal axis an angle belonging to the given sequence, that differentiates precisely a fixed Orlicz space.
“…Following Stokolos [11] (and using the terminology introduced in Moonens and Rosenblatt [9]), we say that a family of standard dyadic rectangles in R n has finite width in case it is a finite union of families of rectangles totally ordered by inclusion, and that it has infinite width otherwise. Il follows from a general result by Dilworth [4] that a family of rectangles in R n has infinite width if and only if it contains families of incomparable (with respect to inclusion) rectangles having arbitrary large (finite) cardinality.…”
Section: Comparability Conditions On Rectanglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove Theorem 7, it is sufficient, according to Proposition 3, to prove the following lemma, improving on Stokolos techniques in [11] and [13], and using Rademacher functions as in [9]. Lemma 10.…”
Section: Another Series Of Examples After Stokolosmentioning
In this work we investigate families of translation invariant differentiation bases B of rectangles in R n , for which L log n−1 L(R n ) is the largest Orlicz space that B differentiates. In particular, we improve on techniques developed by A. Stokolos in [11] and [13].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.