Moving and being moved: Differences in cerebral activation during recollection of whole-body motion

Wutte, Magdalena; Glasauer, Stefan; Jahn, Klaus; Flanagin, Virginia L.

doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.042

Cited by 17 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another loophole would be to attribute the hypothetical effect of the back turning to an effect of feature overlap of a passive movement and a described motion, i.e., an effect of compatibility effect between the direction of being back-rotated and the linguistically implied manual rotation. This second loophole also appears questionable considering that the encoding of a passive motion crucially differs from the encoding of a self-motion (e.g., Wutte, Glasauer, Jahn, & Flanagin, 2012). Aside from the specific problems of the two loopholes, the principal objection against the back-turning account is that it has to exclude motor planning as a basis for explanation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Verb gapping: An action-gap compatibility study

Claus

2015

Acta Psychologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Verb gapping: An action-gap compatibility study

Claus

2015

Acta Psychologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The bulk of the motor simulation literature, including studies on intergroup differences (Xu et al, 2009; Avenanti et al, 2010; Gutsell and Inzlicht, 2010; Azevedo et al, in press), has focused on the processes ongoing during observation. However, a few studies have shown that motor representations from observation are reactivated during retrieval (Senkfor et al, 2002; Wutte et al, 2012). Consistent with a motor-simulation account of the present false memory effect, Wutte et al (2012) found overlapping neural activation in motor areas when participants remembered self-performed and observed movements.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

When Do We Confuse Self and Other in Action Memory? Reduced False Memories of Self-Performance after Observing Actions by an Out-Group vs. In-Group Actor

Lindner¹,

Schain²,

Kopietz³

et al. 2012

Front. Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observing another person performing an action can lead to a false memory of having performed the action oneself – the observation-inflation effect. In the experimental paradigm, participants first perform or do not perform simple actions, and then observe another person perform some of these actions. The observation-inflation effect is found when participants later remember performing actions that they have merely observed. In this case, self and other are confused in action memory. We examined social conditions of this self-other confusion when remembering actions, specifically whether the effect depends on the observed actor’s group membership. In our experiment, we manipulated group membership based on physical appearance, specifically complexion of the hands. Fair-skinned participants observed either an in-group (i.e., fair-skinned) or an out-group (i.e., dark-skinned) actor. Our results revealed that the observed actor’s group membership moderated the observation-inflation effect: False memories were significantly reduced when the actor was from the out-group (vs. in-group). We found no difference to a control condition in which the actor wore black gloves, suggesting that distinctiveness of perceptual or sensory features alone (due to the out-group member’s dark skin) is not critical. We discuss these findings in light of social-neuroscience studies demonstrating the impact of an observed person’s group membership on motor simulation. Overall, our findings suggest that action memory can be affected by a ubiquitous feature of people’s social perception, that is, group-based social categorization of others.

show abstract

“…Compared to a standing condition (see Table 2), walking was associated with enhanced activation in cortical and subcortical structures as SMA (Cremers et al, 2012;Godde and Voelcker-Rehage, 2010;Ionta et al, 2010;Malouin et al, 2003;Peterson et al, 2014b;Wagner et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008a), primary motor cortex (M1) (Wagner et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008a;Wutte et al, 2012), prefrontal cortex (Cremers et al, 2012Malouin et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2008a;Wutte et al, 2012), premotor cortex (Cremers et al, 2012Malouin et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2008a), M a n u s c r i p t 11 cingulate cortex (Cremers et al, 2012;Malouin et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2008a;Wutte et al, 2012), temporal gyrus (Godde and Voelcker-Rehage, 2010;Wang et al, 2008a), occipital cortex (Wagner et al, 2008), parietal (Cremers et al, 2012Malouin et al, 2003;Wagner et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008a), precuneus/cuneus (Malouin et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2008a;Wutte et al, 2012), thalamus (Ionta et al, 2010;Wutte et al, 2012), parahipocampal gyrus (Cremers et al, 2012;Wagner et al, 2008;Wutte et al, 2012), putamen (Cremers et al, 2012;…”

Section: Brain Activity Of Healthy People During Gait Imagerymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Page 35 of 57 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p 35 Miyai et al (2001) please see Zwergal et al (2012) please see table 4 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p 40 Malouin et al (2003) please see Wutte et al (2012) please see table 2 Table 4 Imagined walking in patients with and without FoG: ↑ MLR for patients FoG+ ↑ trend in lt. SMA (BA 6) and the rt. sup.…”

Section: Page 34 Of 57mentioning

confidence: 99%